Related Experiment Videos
Methodological concerns and quality appraisal of contemporary systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric
Luis H Braga1, Julia Pemberton, Jorge Demaria
1Department of Surgery (Urology), McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Canada. braga@mcmaster.ca
Insights
The quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric urology is often poor. Improving the scientific rigor of these reviews is crucial for evidence-based clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Medical Research Methodology
Background:
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are vital for evidence-based medicine.
- The quality of these reviews directly impacts their influence on clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric urology.
- To identify areas for improvement in published pediatric urology research.
Main Methods:
- Searched PubMed and Embase for systematic reviews/meta-analyses in top pediatric urology journals (2000-2009).
- Evaluated scientific methodological quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool.
- Two independent reviewers selected and reviewed articles.
Main Results:
- 15 articles met inclusion criteria; 47% were published in 2009.
- Few reviews described comprehensive search strategies (7%) or included non-English studies (20%).
- Only 33% reported quality assessment and 33% assessed publication bias; 47% were rated as less than fair methodological quality by AMSTAR.
Conclusions:
- Despite increased publication, nearly half of pediatric urology systematic reviews/meta-analyses lack adequate scientific quality.
- There is a need to enhance the methodological rigor of these reviews to ensure their reliability in guiding clinical decisions.
Purpose:
The usefulness of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in influencing clinical practice depends on their quality. We sought to analyze the quality of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric urology.
Materials And Methods:
We searched PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in the top 5 pediatric urology journals between January 2000 and November 2009. Two reviewers independently selected articles for full text review. Scientific methodological quality was evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 11-item tool.
Results:
Of 267 initial results 220 articles were excluded because they were surveys, case reports or narrative reviews. Full text evaluation of the remaining 47 articles further excluded 32 series of exclusively adult patients, leaving 15 for final analysis. Seven articles (47%) were published in 2009 (p <0.01). Only 1 review (7%) described a full search strategy and 3 (20%) allowed inclusion of non-English studies. In 8 reviews (53%) selection of studies was performed by 2 reviewers. Five systematic reviews (33%) described some form of quality assessment. Only 5 reviews (33%) described assessment of publication bias, while 8 (53%) checked for heterogeneity among studies. According to AMSTAR criteria, 7 systematic reviews (47%) were considered of less than fair methodological quality, 5 (33%) fair to good quality and 3 (20%) good quality.
Conclusions:
Despite a recent increase in the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in pediatric urology journals, almost half of these reviews lack good scientific quality, raising concerns about their role in influencing clinical practice. Efforts should be made to improve the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the pediatric urology literature.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Disorders of the Male Reproductive System
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra. Symptoms...