Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
Published on: February 20, 2019
Adolescents' implicit theories predict desire for vengeance after peer conflicts: correlational and experimental
David S Yeager1, Kali H Trzesniewski, Kirsi Tirri
1School of Education and Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. dyeager@stanford.edu
Abstract:
Why do some adolescents respond to interpersonal conflicts vengefully, whereas others seek more positive solutions? Three studies investigated the role of implicit theories of personality in predicting violent or vengeful responses to peer conflicts among adolescents in Grades 9 and 10. They showed that a greater belief that traits are fixed (an entity theory) predicted a stronger desire for revenge after a variety of recalled peer conflicts (Study 1) and after a hypothetical conflict that specifically involved bullying (Study 2). Study 3 experimentally induced a belief in the potential for change (an incremental theory), which resulted in a reduced desire to seek revenge. This effect was mediated by changes in bad-person attributions about the perpetrators, feelings of shame and hatred, and the belief that vengeful ideation is an effective emotion-regulation strategy. Together, the findings illuminate the social-cognitive processes underlying reactions to conflict and suggest potential avenues for reducing violent retaliation in adolescents.
Related Concept Videos
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...

