Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

A Real-World High-Intensity Interval Training Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Improvement
Published on: February 22, 2022
Effect of equated continuous and interval running programs on endurance performance and jump capacity
José L Tuimil1, Daniel A Boullosa, Miguel A Fernández-del-Olmo
1Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Oleiros, Galicia, Spain. tuimillo@udc.es
Both continuous and interval training programs improved maximal aerobic speed (MAS) similarly in moderately trained men over 8 weeks. Neither training type significantly affected time limit at MAS (Tlim) or countermovement jump (CMJ) performance.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Sports Science
- Human Performance
Background:
- Maximal aerobic speed (MAS) is a key indicator of endurance performance.
- Understanding the impact of different training modalities on MAS is crucial for optimizing training programs.
- Previous research has explored interval and continuous training, but direct comparisons with equated workloads are less common.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of 8-week interval training and continuous training programs on maximal aerobic speed (MAS).
- To assess the impact of these training programs on time limit at MAS (Tlim) and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance.
- To determine if training intensity and duration, when equated for external workload, yield similar improvements in aerobic capacity.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-two physically active men were assigned to an interval training group (ITG), continuous training group (CTG), or a control group.
- Both ITG and CTG underwent 8 weeks of training, 3 sessions per week, with identical external workloads but different intensity/duration profiles.
- MAS, Tlim, and CMJ were measured before and after the intervention period.
Main Results:
- Both the ITG (5.8% increase) and CTG (8.3% increase) demonstrated significant improvements in MAS (p < 0.01).
- The improvements in MAS were statistically similar between the interval and continuous training groups.
- No significant changes were observed in Tlim or CMJ performance for either training group post-intervention.
Conclusions:
- Eight weeks of continuous or interval running programs, with externally equated workloads, lead to comparable improvements in maximal aerobic speed.
- These training interventions do not significantly alter time limit at MAS or countermovement jump performance in moderately trained individuals.
- The findings suggest that both training modalities can be effective for enhancing aerobic capacity when the overall training load is matched.
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be met...
Exercise Stress Test
Exercise stress testing, commonly known as a treadmill test, is a noninvasive procedure used to evaluate cardiovascular function and diagnose heart conditions.
Definition
An exercise stress test measures the heart's response to exertion using a treadmill or stationary bicycle. Chest electrodes record the heart's electrical activity through an ECG, and blood pressure is monitored regularly.
Purposes
