Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Karyotyping

Karyotyping

Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...

Karyotyping

Karyotyping

Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...

Nondisjunction

Nondisjunction

Nondisjunction is the failure of homologous chromosomes or sister chromatids to separate correctly and move to the opposite poles of the cells. This produces daughter cells with abnormal chromosome numbers. Nondisjunction is common during anaphase I or anaphase II of meiosis. Mutations in synaptonemal complex proteins that attach homologous chromosomes increase the chances of nondisjunction in anaphase I of meiosis I. In contrast, mutations in topoisomerases and condensins that hold sister...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

From disease prevention to fertility treatment: rethinking the use of mitochondrial donation for oocyte-related infertility in the light of safety and efficacy.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Beyond integration: towards benchmarks for developmental potential in human stem cell-derived embryo models.

Human reproduction update·2026

Same author

Assessing the Impact of Visualizations of Quantitative and Qualitative Risk Information on the Comprehension of Hypothetical Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening Results.

Health communication·2025

Same author

Stem cell-derived gametes: what to expect when expecting their clinical introduction.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2025

Same author

How do programme directors perceive trainee attrition? A qualitative focus group study in three Dutch teaching hospitals.

BMJ open·2025

Same author

Cervical cancer care at a tertiary oncology facility in Uganda: Comparing daily practice with national treatment targets on cervical cancer control.

PloS one·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Published on: August 25, 2019

Rapid aneuploidy detection or karyotyping? Ethical reflection.

Antina de Jong¹, Wybo J Dondorp, Daniëlle R M Timmermans

¹Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. at.dejong@maastrichtuniversity.nl

European Journal of Human Genetics : EJHG

|June 2, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Rapid aneuploidy detection (RAD) offers limited advantages over traditional karyotyping for prenatal screening. The study suggests offering women a choice between RAD and karyotyping to support autonomous reproductive decisions.

More Related Videos

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

Chromosome Preparation From Cultured Cells

Chromosome Preparation From Cultured Cells

Published on: January 28, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Published on: August 25, 2019

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

Chromosome Preparation From Cultured Cells

Chromosome Preparation From Cultured Cells

Published on: January 28, 2014

Area of Science:

Prenatal Diagnostics
Medical Ethics
Genetics

Background:

Consensus is lacking on whether to offer rapid aneuploidy detection (RAD) or karyotyping for women at increased risk for trisomy 21, 13, and 18.
RAD is a faster, cheaper, and targeted aneuploidy screening method.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine the ethical implications of using RAD in prenatal screening.
To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of RAD compared to karyotyping.

Main Methods:

Ethical analysis of RAD's purported benefits.
Comparison of RAD and karyotyping regarding speed, cost, information provided, and detection scope.
Consideration of differing professional and patient perspectives.

Main Results:

The advantages of RAD, such as short-term psychological benefits and cost-effectiveness, are less robust than suggested.
RAD may miss abnormalities detectable by karyotyping, with differing interpretations of this consequence by professionals and patients.
The informational advantage of RAD is diminished as pre-test counseling must include information on karyotyping.

Conclusions:

No single argument for RAD is decisive.
The perceived value of RAD depends on one's view of prenatal screening's scope.
Offering women a choice between RAD and karyotyping best supports autonomous reproductive decisions and aligns with prenatal screening's goals.