Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).Mechanisms of Genetic VariationThe original sources of genetic variation are mutations,...
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Congruency of fatigue-mediated changes in shear wave velocity, upper limb force, muscle activity, and kinematics of the scapular stabilizer muscles.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2026
Same author

Shoulder Kinematic and Muscle Activity Compensations to Scapular Stabilizer Weakness: An Optimal Control Framework.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Muscle coactivation changes following a fatiguing overhead drilling task: Implications for subacromial impingement syndrome.

Applied ergonomics·2025
Same author

Evaluating the Relationship Between Surface and Intramuscular-Based Electromyography Signals: Implications of Subcutaneous Fat Thickness.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2024
Same author

Harnessing gut cells for functional insulin production: Strategies and challenges.

Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2024
Same author

Variability in musculoskeletal fatigue responses associated with repeated exposure to an occupational overhead drilling task completed on successive days.

Human movement science·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

Bootstrap estimation of confidence intervals on mutation rate ratios.

Matthew S Russell1, John C March

  • 1Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.

Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
|June 2, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a bootstrap method to compare mutation rates between cell strains. This approach provides reliable confidence intervals, improving mutation rate analysis in biological research.

More Related Videos

Studying Ribonucleotide Incorporation: Strand-specific Detection of Ribonucleotides in the Yeast Genome and Measuring Ribonucleotide-induced Mutagenesis
09:04

Studying Ribonucleotide Incorporation: Strand-specific Detection of Ribonucleotides in the Yeast Genome and Measuring Ribonucleotide-induced Mutagenesis

Published on: July 26, 2018

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

Studying Ribonucleotide Incorporation: Strand-specific Detection of Ribonucleotides in the Yeast Genome and Measuring Ribonucleotide-induced Mutagenesis
09:04

Studying Ribonucleotide Incorporation: Strand-specific Detection of Ribonucleotides in the Yeast Genome and Measuring Ribonucleotide-induced Mutagenesis

Published on: July 26, 2018

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Area of Science:

  • * Genetics and Cell Biology
  • * Statistical Bioinformatics

Background:

  • * Fluctuation tests are standard for estimating cellular mutation rates.
  • * Current statistical methods struggle to compare mutation rates across different strains or conditions due to variations in cell counts.
  • * Existing confidence intervals for mutation counts do not directly translate to reliable mutation rate comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To develop a robust statistical method for comparing mutation rates derived from fluctuation tests.
  • * To address the limitations of existing methods in handling variations in cell numbers between cultures.
  • * To provide a validated bootstrap approach for calculating confidence intervals on the ratio of mutation rates.

Main Methods:

  • * A bootstrap resampling technique was employed to estimate confidence intervals.
  • * Monte Carlo simulations were used to validate the method's accuracy across diverse mutation rates and cell count variations.
  • * The method was designed to compare mutation rates between experimental and control groups.

Main Results:

  • * The proposed bootstrap method effectively estimates confidence intervals for the quotient of two mutation rates.
  • * Validation through Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the method's reliability under various conditions, including empirical cell count variations.
  • * The developed computational tools facilitate practical application of the method.

Conclusions:

  • * The bootstrap method offers a statistically sound approach for comparing mutation rates from fluctuation tests.
  • * This method enhances the ability to detect differences in mutation rates between biological samples.
  • * The study provides valuable tools and a validated method for mutation rate analysis in genetics research.