Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Shame and honour drive cooperation
Jennifer Jacquet1, Christoph Hauert, Arne Traulsen
1Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. j.jacquet@fisheries.ubc.ca
Abstract:
Can the threat of being shamed or the prospect of being honoured lead to greater cooperation? We test this hypothesis with anonymous six-player public goods experiments, an experimental paradigm used to investigate problems related to overusing common resources. We instructed the players that the two individuals who were least generous after 10 rounds would be exposed to the group. As the natural antithesis, we also test the effects of honour by revealing the identities of the two players who were most generous. The non-monetary, reputational effects induced by shame and honour each led to approximately 50 per cent higher donations to the public good when compared with the control, demonstrating that both shame and honour can drive cooperation and can help alleviate the tragedy of the commons.
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation
Obedience
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
The Stanford Prison Experiment