Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calculation of First-Law Quantities II01:24

Calculation of First-Law Quantities II

The first law of thermodynamics establishes that the change in internal energy of a system is given by ΔU = q + w, where q is the heat exchanged, and w is the work performed. For a perfect gas, both internal energy (U) and enthalpy (H) depend solely on temperature. Consequently, for any change of state, whether reversible or irreversible, the internal energy change is determined by integrating the heat capacity at constant volume, and the enthalpy change by integrating the heat capacity at...
Standing Waves in a Cavity01:28

Standing Waves in a Cavity

A household microwave and lasers are examples of standing electromagnetic waves in a cavity. When two conducting metal plates are placed parallel at the nodal planes, it creates a cavity where standing waves are formed. The cavity between the two planes is analogous to a stretched string held at the points x = 0 and x = L. Here, the distance 'L' between the two planes must be an integer multiple of half of the wavelength. The wavelengths that satisfy this condition are given by:
Calculation of First Law Quantities I01:25

Calculation of First Law Quantities I

Thermodynamic systems undergoing phase transitions or temperature changes experience energy transfer in the form of heat (q) and work (w). For a reversible phase change at constant temperature (T) and pressure (p), the process involves no chemical reaction but results in energy exchange between distinct phases.The heat transferred during this process corresponds to the latent heat of transition, which is the amount of heat energy absorbed or released by a substance when it changes from one...
Differential Form of Maxwell's Equations01:17

Differential Form of Maxwell's Equations

James Clerk Maxwell (1831–1879) was one of the significant contributors to physics in the nineteenth century. He is probably best known for having combined existing knowledge of the laws of electricity and the laws of magnetism with his insights to form a complete overarching electromagnetic theory, represented by Maxwell's equations. The four basic laws of electricity and magnetism were discovered experimentally through the work of physicists such as Oersted, Coulomb, Gauss, and Faraday.
Divergence and Curl of Electric Field01:25

Divergence and Curl of Electric Field

The divergence of a vector is a measure of how much the vector spreads out (diverges) from a point. For example, an electric field vector diverges from the positive charge and converges at the negative charge. The divergence of an electric field is derived using Gauss's law and is equal to the charge density divided by the permittivity of space. Mathematically, it is expressed as
Space-Time Curvature and the General Theory of Relativity01:17

Space-Time Curvature and the General Theory of Relativity

In 1905, Albert Einstein published his special theory of relativity. According to this theory, no matter in the universe can attain a speed greater than the speed of light in a vacuum, which thus serves as the speed limit of the universe.
This has been verified in many experiments. However, space and time are no longer absolute. Two observers moving relative to one another do not agree on the length of objects or the passage of time. The mechanics of objects based on Newton's laws of motion,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental Limits on Planetary Mass Primordial Black Hole Mergers.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Author Correction: The multi-mode acoustic gravitational wave experiment: MAGE.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Exclusion of Axionlike-Particle Cogenesis Dark Matter in a Mass Window above 100  μeV.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Erratum: "Sensitivity analysis of a resonant-mass gravitational wave antenna with a parametric transducer" [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 2751-2759 (1995)].

The Review of scientific instruments·2023
Same author

The multi-mode acoustic gravitational wave experiment: MAGE.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Aqueous Solid Formation Kinetics in High-Pressure Methane at Trace Water Concentrations.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

Cavity bounds on higher-order lorentz-violating coefficients.

Stephen R Parker1, Matthew Mewes, Paul L Stanwix

  • 1School of Physics, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA, Australia.

Physical Review Letters
|June 4, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study tested a modern Michelson-Morley experiment for violations of Lorentz symmetry. It established the first experimental limits on nonrenormalizable Lorentz-violating operators in the Standard Model Extension.

More Related Videos

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Fundamental Physics
  • Particle Physics
  • Experimental Physics

Background:

  • The Standard Model Extension (SME) offers a framework to test for potential violations of Lorentz symmetry.
  • Lorentz violation could manifest through nonbirefringent and nondispersive coefficients.
  • Previous experiments have constrained certain SME coefficients, but higher-order terms remain largely untested.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the sensitivity of a modern resonant-cavity Michelson-Morley experiment to higher-order SME coefficients.
  • To establish the first experimental constraints on coefficients associated with nonrenormalizable Lorentz-violating operators.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from a year-long run of a contemporary Michelson-Morley resonant-cavity experiment.
  • Analyzed the data to probe for subtle variations indicative of Lorentz violation.
  • Applied theoretical models to interpret the experimental sensitivity to specific SME coefficients.

Main Results:

  • The experiment demonstrated sensitivity to higher-order nonbirefringent and nondispersive SME coefficients.
  • The first direct experimental bounds were placed on coefficients linked to nonrenormalizable Lorentz-violating operators.
  • These results significantly extend the scope of experimental tests for Lorentz symmetry violation.

Conclusions:

  • Modern resonant-cavity Michelson-Morley experiments are powerful tools for probing fundamental physics beyond the Standard Model.
  • The study successfully constrained previously unmeasured parameters within the Standard Model Extension.
  • This work opens new avenues for searching for subtle signs of Lorentz violation in high-precision experiments.