Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...

Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (AFS) is an analytical technique that involves the electronic transitions of atoms in a flame, furnace, or plasma being excited by electromagnetic (EM) radiation. When these atoms absorb energy, they become excited and subsequently release energy as they return to their original state. This emitted light, or "fluorescence," is observed at a right angle to the incident beam. Both absorption and emission processes transpire at distinct wavelengths, which are...

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte properties and...

Flame Photometry: Overview

Flame Photometry: Overview

Flame photometry, also known as flame emission spectrometry, is a technique used for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of elements present in a sample using a flame as the source of excitation energy. The concept of flame photometry was realized in the early 1860s by Kirchhoff and Bunsen, who discovered that specific elements emit characteristic radiation when excited in flames. The first instrument developed for this purpose was used to measure sodium (Na) in plant ash using a Bunsen...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Unveiling bulk and surface radiation forces in a dielectric liquid.

Light, science & applications·2022

Same author

Heterozygous <i>TERT</i> gene mutation associated with familial idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Respiratory medicine case reports·2019

Same author

Photoacoustic signal and noise analysis for Si thin plate: signal correction in frequency domain.

The Review of scientific instruments·2015

Same author

Pulsed photothermal mirror technique: characterization of opaque materials.

Applied optics·2015

Same author

Implications of water hardness in ecotoxicological assessments for water quality regulatory purposes: a case study with the aquatic snail Biomphalaria glabrata (Say, 1818).

Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia·2014

Same author

Endothelialization of chitosan porous conduits via immobilization of a recombinant fibronectin fragment (rhFNIII7-10).

Acta biomaterialia·2012

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

Temperature-dependent electron capture detector response to common alternative fluorocarbons.

S R Sousa¹, S E Bialkowski

¹Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-0300.

Analytical Chemistry

|June 7, 2011

Summary

Gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD) shows low sensitivity for alternative fluorocarbons (AFCs). Substantial preconcentration is needed for analyzing AFCs at atmospheric concentrations using GC-ECD.

More Related Videos

Highly Sensitive and Rapid Fluorescence Detection with a Portable FRET Analyzer

Highly Sensitive and Rapid Fluorescence Detection with a Portable FRET Analyzer

Published on: October 1, 2016

Time-resolved Photophysical Characterization of Triplet-harvesting Organic Compounds at an Oxygen-free Environment Using an iCCD Camera

Time-resolved Photophysical Characterization of Triplet-harvesting Organic Compounds at an Oxygen-free Environment Using an iCCD Camera

Published on: December 27, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

Highly Sensitive and Rapid Fluorescence Detection with a Portable FRET Analyzer

Highly Sensitive and Rapid Fluorescence Detection with a Portable FRET Analyzer

Published on: October 1, 2016

Time-resolved Photophysical Characterization of Triplet-harvesting Organic Compounds at an Oxygen-free Environment Using an iCCD Camera

Time-resolved Photophysical Characterization of Triplet-harvesting Organic Compounds at an Oxygen-free Environment Using an iCCD Camera

Published on: December 27, 2018

Area of Science:

Environmental Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry

Background:

Alternative fluorocarbons (AFCs) are increasingly used, necessitating sensitive analytical methods for environmental monitoring.
Conventional gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD) is a common technique for analyzing halogenated compounds.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the sensitivity and applicability of GC-ECD for the analysis of various AFCs.
To investigate the performance of different GC columns for AFC separation.
To elucidate the electron capture mechanisms of AFCs.

Main Methods:

GC-ECD analysis of selected chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).
Evaluation of Poraplot Q WPLOT and Carboxen 1004 packed columns for AFC separation.
Thermodynamic and temperature-dependent studies to understand ECD response mechanisms.

Main Results:

ECD response to AFCs was significantly lower (≥1 order of magnitude) than CFC-12.
Detection limits varied widely, with HFCs showing poorer performance (ng vs. pg for CFCs).
HFC-152a was not detected; Poraplot Q WPLOT and Carboxen 1004 columns presented trade-offs in separation and detection limits.
Proposed mechanisms involve dissociative electron capture or molecular ion formation depending on the AFC.

Conclusions:

GC-ECD, without preconcentration, is not sufficiently sensitive for analyzing AFCs at typical atmospheric concentrations.
Column selection impacts separation efficiency and detection limits.
Understanding electron capture mechanisms is crucial for optimizing AFC analysis.