Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry01:19

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

6.4K
Mass spectrometry is a powerful characterization technique that can identify and separate a wide variety of compounds ranging from chemical to biological entities, based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). The instruments that allow this detection, known as mass spectrometers, have three components: an ion source, a mass analyzer, and a detector. These spectrometers differ based on the nature of their ion source and analyzers.Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is a commonly...
6.4K
Tandem Mass Spectrometry01:21

Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2.2K
Tandem mass spectrometry is a technique that uses multiple mass analyzers in series to obtain a higher selectivity and reduce chemical noise during analyte detection. Instruments with multiple analyzers separated by an interaction cell enable secondary fragmentation and selected study of the fragment ions.Secondary fragmentations occur in the interaction cell and can be induced by various factors. Fragmentation induced by collision with inert gases, such as N2, Ar, He, etc., is called...
2.2K
Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry01:33

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry

8.0K
Tandem mass spectrometry, also known as MS/MS or MS2, is an analytical technique that employs two mass analyzers. Essentially it is a series of mass spectrometers that helps isolate a particular biomolecule and then helps study its chemical properties.
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

A review of machine learning in toxicology: current practices and reporting gaps.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same author

Stage-dependent effects of systemic ASBT inhibition in a cholestasis-induced cholemic nephropathy mouse model.

JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology·2025
Same author

Elimination of CDX2 restricts intestinal hybrid differentiation signatures in stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells.

Stem cell research & therapy·2025
Same author

Adjustment for day-to-day variability in the estimation of effective concentrations for the assessment of mixture toxicity.

Archives of toxicology·2025
Same author

Critical discussion of recently published claims of a causal relationship between bat decline and infant mortality.

Archives of toxicology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization
12:11

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization

Published on: February 27, 2020

7.2K

Probabilistic consensus scoring improves tandem mass spectrometry peptide identification.

Sven Nahnsen1, Andreas Bertsch, Jörg Rahnenführer

  • 1Center for Bioinformatics, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. sven.nahnsen@uni-tuebingen.de

Journal of Proteome Research
|June 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel consensus scoring framework for peptide identification in mass spectrometry. Combining scores from multiple search engines significantly improves peptide identification rates, identifying up to 60% more peptides than single engines.

More Related Videos

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.5K
Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization
12:11

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization

Published on: February 27, 2020

7.2K
Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.5K
Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Tandem mass spectrometry is crucial for peptide identification.
  • Current database search engines have limitations in identification accuracy.
  • Combining results from multiple search engines can enhance peptide identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a probabilistic framework for combining search engine scores.
  • To improve the accuracy and number of peptide identifications.
  • To estimate p-values for candidate peptides across combined search results.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel method to estimate scores for peptides missed by individual search engines.
  • Implemented a probabilistic framework for joint consensus scoring.
  • Integrated the consensus approach into the OpenMS software framework.

Main Results:

  • The consensus approach outperforms any single search engine across various instrument types.
  • Identified up to 60% more peptides compared to the MASCOT standard.
  • Improvements in identification rates varied depending on the platform and search engine used.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed consensus scoring framework significantly enhances peptide identification in mass spectrometry.
  • This method offers a robust solution for improving proteomic data analysis.
  • The open-source software implementation facilitates widespread adoption and further research.