Benchmarking the OptiSpray-μPAC Workflow against a Traditional Nanospray Capillary Interface for Multiplexed...

Nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) underpins modern quantitative proteomics, yet the column-to-mass spectrometer interface remains an important yet often underappreciated determinant of analytical depth, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Here, we benchmark an integrated workflow comprising the newly developed OptiSpray ion source and a micropillar array column (μPAC) cartridge against a conventional Nanospray Flex Source with an Accucore resin-packed capillary column. We performed a TMTpro 18-plex experiment across nine human cell lines on a FAIMS Pro-equipped Orbitrap Exploris 480. Following basic-pH reversed-phase fractionation, 12 fractions were analyzed on both workflow configurations under matched chromatographic gradient and acquisition conditions. Across both configurations, we quantified >9000 protein groups with highly comparable quantitative reproducibility and principal component clustering. Direct comparison of protein abundance ratios across cell lines showed agreement (Pearson R2 ≈ 0.7-0.8) without systematic bias. These results were achieved without workflow-specific optimization of the OptiSpray-μPAC platform, enabling direct transfer of established acquisition methods. Despite differences in column architecture, both configurations delivered comparable proteome coverage and quantitative fidelity. These findings establish the OptiSpray-μPAC workflow as a standardized alternative to conventional capillary-based interfaces, offering simplified operation while preserving quantitative performance.