Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)01:27

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) serves as the primary classification system for mental health disorders, providing standardized diagnostic criteria for clinicians and researchers. First published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1952, the DSM has undergone several revisions to reflect evolving psychiatric understanding. The fifth edition, DSM-5, released in 2013, introduced key updates that expanded diagnostic categories and modified diagnostic...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Mental Illness Influences Pretrial Release Decisions for People Charged with Misdemeanors.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2025
Same author

Youth Inpatient and Residential Treatment Psychiatric Beds: National Trends and Potential Causal Factors, 2010-2022.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2025
Same author

Attending to Persons with Intellectual and/or Other Developmental Disorders in Crisis Settings.

The Psychiatric clinics of North America·2024
Same author

Parents' views of benefits and limitations of receiving genetic diagnoses for their offspring.

Child: care, health and development·2023
Same author

Older Workers, Cognitive Impairment, and Discrimination.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2023
Same author

Gender Differences in Civil Commitment Hearing Experience for Persons Who Use Opioids.

Journal of addiction medicine·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

Evaluating psychiatric disability: differences by forensic expertise.

Paul P Christopher1, Rasim Arikan, Debra A Pinals

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA. paul.christopher@umassmed.edu

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|June 10, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic and nonforensic psychiatrists differ in their views on psychiatric disability evaluations for Social Security benefits, particularly regarding dual agency and decision-making weight. These differences impact patient care and ethical considerations in disability assessments.

More Related Videos

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
09:55

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder

Published on: March 8, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
09:55

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder

Published on: March 8, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Social Security Law

Background:

  • Psychiatric disability evaluations present ethical and practical challenges for psychiatrists.
  • Third-party requests for evaluations, especially for Social Security disability benefits, complicate the process.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the approaches and perceptions of forensic and nonforensic psychiatrists regarding Social Security disability evaluations.
  • To identify differences in views on role, objectivity, and dual agency in the disability evaluation process.

Main Methods:

  • Survey distributed to 32 forensic and 75 nonforensic psychiatrists.
  • Questions focused on practice patterns and perceptions of key aspects of disability evaluations.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences emerged between forensic and nonforensic psychiatrists.
  • Discrepancies noted in perceptions of dual-agency conflict, preferred evaluators, and the weight of opinions in benefit decisions.
  • A minority in both groups reported diagnosing disability contrary to their own beliefs.

Conclusions:

  • Forensic and nonforensic psychiatrists hold distinct views on psychiatric disability evaluations.
  • These differing perspectives have implications for the consistency and ethical conduct of Social Security disability assessments.
  • Further discussion is needed on the implications for patient care and the disability determination process.