Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Upper bonded retainers
1Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Germany. sabine.ruf@dentist.med.uni-giessen.de
Objective:
To assess the frequency and type of upper bonded retainer failure and to identify possible predisposing factors.
Materials And Methods:
The records of 466 consecutive patients with upper bonded retainers were analyzed retrospectively with respect to retainer failures and failure type as well as timing of failure, differences among operators, and the number of defects of the multibracket appliances (MB) prior to the retention period.
Results:
A total of 58.2% of all patients experienced retainer failures. The average failure odds were 1.26 failures per retainer. The odds were highest for 3-3 retainers (1.37) and lowest for the 1-1 retainer (0.54). The detachment and total loss rates were significantly influenced by operator experience-both rates were lower for experienced practitioners. Total retainer losses occurred more frequently in case of previous MB defects, while retainer fractures were seen more frequently when the retainer included the canines.
Conclusions:
Upper bonded retainer failures are a frequent problem during the retention period (58.2% of patients). Less operator experience correlated with higher failure rates. An increased number of total retainer losses must also be expected with a decreasing number of bonding sites and in cases involving previous MB defects.
Related Concept Videos
Bonding in Metals
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
EDTA: Auxiliary Complexing Reagents
Complexometric Titration: Ligands
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
