Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

07:45
Small-Cage Laboratory Trials of Genetically-Engineered Anopheline Mosquitoes
Published on: May 1, 2021
Behavioral differences of invasive container-dwelling mosquitoes to a native predator
Banugopan Kesavaraju1, Daanish F Khan, Randy Gaugler
1Center for Vector Biology, Rutgers University, 180 Jones Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. banu@slcmad.org
Journal of Medical Entomology
|June 14, 2011
Summary
Invasive mosquito larvae, Aedes albopictus, Aedes japonicus, and Culex pipiens, alter behavior when predators are near. Culex pipiens larvae show the least risky behavior, suggesting they are least vulnerable to predation.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Invasive Species Biology
- Behavioral Ecology
Background:
- Invasive mosquito larvae (Aedes albopictus, Aedes japonicus, Culex pipiens) coexist with native predators in North America.
- Understanding prey behavior in response to predation risk is crucial for predicting invasive species dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate behavioral modifications of invasive mosquito larvae in response to predation-risk cues from Toxorhynchites rutilus.
- To determine the relative vulnerability of Aedes albopictus, Aedes japonicus, and Culex pipiens larvae to predation.
Main Methods:
- Larval mosquito behavior was observed in the presence and absence of predation-risk cues from Toxorhynchites rutilus.
- Time spent resting at the surface (least risky behavior) was quantified for each species.
Main Results:
- Culex pipiens larvae exhibited the most surface-resting behavior, indicating lower vulnerability.
- Aedes japonicus larvae showed more surface-resting behavior than Aedes albopictus larvae.
- Aedes albopictus larvae displayed the most high-risk behaviors, suggesting they are the most vulnerable prey.
Conclusions:
- Toxorhynchites rutilus predation may influence the competitive interactions among invasive mosquito species.
- Predation can prevent competitive exclusion and promote coexistence of invasive mosquito larvae.
- Behavioral responses to predation risk vary significantly among invasive mosquito species.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
Microbial Interactions: Predation
Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
Frequency-dependent Selection
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.

