Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

07:21
Walk with Me Hybrid Virtual/In-Person Walking for Older Adults with Neurodegenerative Disease
Published on: June 16, 2023
Methodological tips for overcoming formative evaluation challenges: the case of the Arthritis Foundation Walk With
Britta Schoster1, Mary Altpeter, Andrea Meier
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Health Promotion Practice
|June 17, 2011
Summary
Formative evaluation of the Arthritis Foundation Walk With Ease program identified participant preferences for program improvement. This study offers practical recommendations for conducting effective evaluations in community-specific health promotion contexts.
Area of Science:
- Health Promotion Program Evaluation
- Community Health Interventions
- Evidence-Based Program Adaptation
Background:
- Formative evaluation is crucial for guiding program improvements and informing decisions.
- Adopting evidence-based health promotion programs requires adaptation to community contexts.
- The Arthritis Foundation Walk With Ease (WWE) program serves as a case study for evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the step-by-step process of conducting a formative evaluation of the WWE program.
- To provide real-world recommendations for adapting formative evaluation methodology.
- To enhance the health impact of community-specific health promotion programs.
Main Methods:
- Triangulated data collection from program leaders, coordinators, and participants.
- Employed diverse methods: written surveys, focus groups, telephone interviews, and expert reviews.
- Evaluated both the original and revised piloted versions of the WWE program.
Main Results:
- Detailed account of the formative evaluation process for the WWE program.
- Identified challenges encountered during data collection and program evaluation.
- Gathered insights into participant preferences and program decision-making factors.
Conclusions:
- Practical methodological recommendations are provided for managing evaluation resources.
- Guidance on effective communication strategies with program respondents is offered.
- Emphasizes the importance of accountability systems for organizing triangulated data in program evaluation.
