Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

The numerical distance effect is task dependent.

Liat Goldfarb1, Avishai Henik, Orly Rubinsten

  • 1The Center for the Study of Brain, Mind and Behavior, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA. lgoldfar@princeton.edu

Memory & Cognition
|June 24, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is "sky" bluer than "grass" is green? Word-color associations dataset for cognitive science.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The illusion of numerical value.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Linguistic experiential priors account for notation-dependent numerical representations.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Gratton effect in the numerical Stroop task is distance dependent.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Irrelevant Task Difficulty Modulates the Emergence of Task Conflict.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

A novel task for measuring numerical bias among adults.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The properties of personal semantics.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

The number distance effect in automatic tasks is questionable, unlike in intentional tasks. This suggests semantic number representations are primarily involved in intentional number comparison, not automatic matching.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The number comparison task exhibits a distance effect, influencing reaction times based on numerical difference.
  • This effect has been interpreted as evidence for semantic number representations.
  • Alternative explanations propose physical digit similarity rather than semantic processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the distance effect in automatic matching and intentional number comparison tasks.
  • To investigate the role of semantic number representations in both task types.
  • To re-evaluate the validity of the distance effect in automatic matching tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of the distance effect across automatic matching and intentional number comparison paradigms.

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

  • Experimental design focusing on specific analytical and procedural factors in matching tasks.
  • Behavioral data analysis to discern semantic versus physical influences.

    • Main Results:

    • The distance effect in intentional number comparison tasks appears to involve an additional semantic component.
    • The presence of a distance effect in standard automatic matching tasks is questioned.
    • Previous findings of distance effects in matching tasks may be artifacts of specific experimental designs.

    Conclusions:

    • Semantic number representations are more strongly implicated in intentional number comparison.
    • The automatic semantic component of the distance effect in matching tasks is not robust.
    • Replication and careful design are crucial for studying the distance effect in automatic tasks.