Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models
10:09

Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models

Published on: October 9, 2014

Rigidity of unilateral external fixators--a biomechanical study.

P T P W Burgers1, M P J M Van Riel, L M M Vogels

  • 1Department of Surgery-Traumatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. p.t.p.w.burgers@erasmusmc.nl

Injury
|June 28, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Co-option of transcription factors drives evolution of quantitative disease resistance against a necrotrophic pathogen.

The Plant cell·2025
Same author

Fracture type, treatment, and outcome of humeral shaft fractures in polytraumatized patients: a case series.

Acta orthopaedica Belgica·2025
Same author

Psychological health status after major trauma across different levels of trauma care: A multicentre secondary analysis.

Injury·2025
Same author

Long-term musculoskeletal function after Open Pelvic ring fractures in Children (OPEC); a multicentre, retrospective case series with follow-up measurement.

Trauma case reports·2024
Same author

Identifying the severely injured benefitting from a specific level of trauma care in an inclusive network: A multicentre retrospective study.

Injury·2023
Same author

Trends in incidence, health care consumption, and costs for proximal femoral fractures in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2019: a nationwide study.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2023

The Dynafix DFS Standard Fixator showed less rigidity under parallel and axial forces compared to the Orthofix ProCallus Fixator. However, it offered better stability against transverse forces and rotation during distraction.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic biomechanics
  • Trauma surgery
  • Medical device engineering

Background:

  • External fixation is crucial for temporary fracture stabilization in polytrauma patients.
  • Achieving adequate stability is essential for optimal initial fracture healing.
  • This study compares the rigidity of two external fixator devices: Dynafix DFS Standard Fixator (4 joints) and Orthofix ProCallus Fixator (2 joints).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the biomechanical rigidity of the Dynafix DFS Standard Fixator and the Orthofix ProCallus Fixator.
  • To evaluate how differing joint configurations affect fixator stability under various loading conditions.
  • To determine the most stable fixator for specific clinical applications in polytrauma.

Main Methods:

  • Standardized testing model with 10 repetitions for each device.

More Related Videos

A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats
05:34

A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats

Published on: May 20, 2019

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
06:41

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions

Published on: March 22, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models
10:09

Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models

Published on: October 9, 2014

A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats
05:34

A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats

Published on: May 20, 2019

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
06:41

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions

Published on: March 22, 2018

  • Application of loads (10N increments up to 160N) in parallel, transversal, and axial (distraction/compression) directions.
  • Calculation of translation resultant and rotation resultant to quantify stability.

    • Main Results:

    • Dynafix DFS exhibited significantly higher translation under 100N parallel force (6.65±1.43mm vs. 3.29±0.83mm).
    • Dynafix DFS showed significantly lower translation under 60N transverse force (8.14±1.20mm vs. 9.83±0.63mm).
    • Dynafix DFS demonstrated higher translation in axial distraction and compression, but lower rotation resultant under distraction (0.70±0.17° vs. 0.97±0.21°).

    Conclusions:

    • Both fixators are most susceptible to transverse forces.
    • Dynafix DFS Standard Fixator offers less rigidity with parallel and axial forces.
    • Dynafix DFS Standard Fixator is advantageous for transverse forces and rotational stability during distraction; neither device's rigidity was affected by repeated heavy loading.