Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach
van Ingrid E Putten1, Sarah M Jennings, Jordan J Louviere
1Commonwealth Science and Industry Research Organisation, Marine and Atmospheric Research, GPO Box 1583, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. ingrid.vanputten@csiro.au
Landowner conservation choices depend on personal factors and program design. Flexible incentive programs can increase participation and reduce costs for conservation efforts.
Area of Science:
- Environmental economics
- Conservation policy
- Landowner behavior
Background:
- Understanding landowner participation in conservation incentive programs is crucial for effective environmental policy.
- Voluntary programs often face challenges in achieving widespread adoption and cost-efficiency.
- Landowner heterogeneity in attitudes and preferences significantly influences conservation decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an empirical model of landowners' choices regarding conservation incentive programs.
- To identify landowner segments based on their attitudes towards conservation reserves.
- To analyze factors influencing voluntary participation and preferred program attributes.
Main Methods:
- A choice survey was used to model landowner decisions between two incentive programs presented as attribute bundles.
- Latent class analysis was applied to choice survey data to account for landowner heterogeneity.
- Preference parameters were estimated to identify distinct landowner groups and their decision-making criteria.
Main Results:
- Three landowner classes were identified: multi-objective, environment, and production owners, with differing conservation attitudes.
- Only a small proportion of landowners, primarily environment owners, would voluntarily join conservation programs.
- Compensation funding influenced voluntary choices for multi-objective and environment owners, but welfare losses were substantial (approx. 4000 AUD/hectare).
Conclusions:
- Landowners willing to participate voluntarily may also conserve land without payment, suggesting potential for reduced government compensation expenditure.
- Flexible program designs, including adaptable legal arrangements and attributes, are key to increasing participation and minimizing welfare losses.
- Targeted incentive programs tailored to specific landowner segments can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of conservation initiatives.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Declining Populations
Conservation of Small Populations
Optimal Foraging
Limits to Natural Selection
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Inclusive Fitness
