Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Determining intrinsic optical properties of 3D printing materials.

Optics express·2025
Same author

Automatic data-driven design and 3D printing of custom ocular prostheses.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Cuttlefish: Pushing the Limits of Graphical 3-D Printing.

IEEE computer graphics and applications·2023
Same author

Multi-printer learning framework for efficient optical printer characterization.

Optics express·2023
Same author

Perceptually Optimizing Color Look-up Tables.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2023
Same author

Inducing robustness and plausibility in deep learning optical 3D printer models.

Optics express·2022
Same journal

Multi-module collaborative optimization-driven fast speckle correlation imaging in variable environments.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Secrecy performance analysis of NOMA-UWOC systems over a vertically stratified WGG oceanic turbulence channel.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Backscattering of plane waves in a composite system containing a rough surface and anisotropic scatterers.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Aspherical surface construction methods based on extended Jacobi polynomials.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

OCT sidelobe suppression method based on dual-path phase sinusoidal modulation and minimum value fusion.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Optical design concepts using wavelength-selective diffractive optics to enable miniaturized multimodal endoscopic imaging across separated spectral ranges.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Enabling High Grayscale Resolution Displays and Accurate Response Time Measurements on Conventional Computers
06:50

Enabling High Grayscale Resolution Displays and Accurate Response Time Measurements on Conventional Computers

Published on: February 29, 2012

Analyzing small suprathreshold differences of LCD-generated colors.

Philipp Urban1, Maria Fedutina, Ingmar Lissner

  • 1Institute of Printing Science and Technology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Magdalenenstrasse 2, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany. urban@idd.tu‐darmstadt.de

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision
|July 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated small color differences on liquid crystal displays (LCDs), finding that lower display luminance reduces perceived differences. However, LCDs showed higher interobserver variability for color perception compared to surface colors.

More Related Videos

EasyFiji: A Graphical Interface for User-Friendly Fluorescence Image Processing in Fiji
10:09

EasyFiji: A Graphical Interface for User-Friendly Fluorescence Image Processing in Fiji

Published on: February 20, 2026

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging
07:15

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging

Published on: July 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Enabling High Grayscale Resolution Displays and Accurate Response Time Measurements on Conventional Computers
06:50

Enabling High Grayscale Resolution Displays and Accurate Response Time Measurements on Conventional Computers

Published on: February 29, 2012

EasyFiji: A Graphical Interface for User-Friendly Fluorescence Image Processing in Fiji
10:09

EasyFiji: A Graphical Interface for User-Friendly Fluorescence Image Processing in Fiji

Published on: February 20, 2026

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging
07:15

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Color Science
  • Visual Perception
  • Display Technology

Background:

  • Understanding color difference perception is crucial for display calibration and color reproduction.
  • Existing research often relies on surface-color datasets, which may not directly translate to emissive displays like LCDs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate small suprathreshold color differences on a typical LCD.
  • To compare LCD-based color differences with established surface-color datasets (RIT-DuPont).
  • To analyze the influence of display characteristics (primaries, luminance) on color perception and interobserver variability.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the method of constant stimuli to assess color differences around five CIE color centers.
  • Employed probit analysis for result evaluation.
  • Compared experimental data with the RIT-DuPont surface-color dataset.

Main Results:

  • Lower luminance levels on the LCD were found to decrease perceived color differences.
  • T50 distances from LCD and surface-color stimuli showed agreement within a constant scaling factor, despite display differences.
  • Significantly higher interobserver variability was observed when judging color differences on an LCD.

Conclusions:

  • Perceived color differences on LCDs are influenced by luminance and display primaries.
  • While T50 distances may scale, LCDs introduce greater uncertainty in color difference judgments.
  • Individual color-matching functions and spectral power distribution may affect color-difference perception on displays.