Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of Neuregulin 1 rs3924999 genotype with antisaccades and smooth pursuit eye movements.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2010
Same author

Cognitive control of saccadic eye movements.

Brain and cognition·2008
Same author

Non-cholinergic modulation of antisaccade performance: a modafinil-nicotine comparison.

Psychopharmacology·2007
Same author

Naturalistic follow-up of co-morbid substance use in schizophrenia: the West London first-episode study.

Psychological medicine·2007
Same author

The effects of dividing attention on smooth pursuit eye tracking.

Experimental brain research·2005
Same author

Clinical correlates of early medication adherence: West London first episode schizophrenia study.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2003

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Error awareness and antisaccade performance.

A J G Taylor1, S B Hutton

  • 1School of Design, Engineering and Computing, Bournemouth University Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, UK.

Experimental Brain Research
|July 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Participants often miss errors in the antisaccade task. Manipulating response speed or adding distractions affected aware errors but not unaware errors, suggesting conscious awareness is key for error correction.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • The antisaccade task measures the ability to suppress a reflexive eye movement to a visual stimulus and instead look in the opposite direction.
  • A significant proportion of errors in the antisaccade task are made without the participant's awareness.
  • Understanding the factors influencing error awareness is crucial for cognitive models of performance and error correction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how manipulations affecting antisaccade error rates influence conscious error awareness.
  • To determine if changes in error rate are mediated by aware or unaware errors.
  • To explore the role of conscious awareness in error correction within the antisaccade task.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using the antisaccade task.
  • Experiment 1 manipulated response instructions (standard, fast, delayed).
  • Experiment 2 introduced dual-task conditions (spatial tapping, random number generation) alongside the antisaccade task.

Main Results:

  • Delaying responses significantly reduced overall antisaccade errors, but only by decreasing aware errors.
  • Unaware error rates remained constant across different response instruction conditions.
  • Dual-task conditions increased aware antisaccade errors but did not affect unaware errors.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that conscious awareness plays a critical role in error correction during the antisaccade task.
  • Manipulations that alter error rates may do so by affecting the processing of aware errors, leaving unaware errors unaffected.
  • This highlights a dissociation between performance errors and conscious error detection, with implications for understanding cognitive control and awareness.