Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Thrombus aspiration alone during primary percutanous coronary intervention as definitive treatment in acute
Miranda C Kramer1, Niels C Verouden, Xiaofei Li
1Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Thrombus aspiration alone is a safe and feasible treatment for selected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). This approach may avoid the need for additional procedures like balloon angioplasty or stenting when residual stenosis is minimal.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pathology
Background:
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with thrombus aspiration may not require additional interventions if residual stenosis is minimal.
- Investigating the feasibility and outcomes of thrombus aspiration alone in STEMI patients is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the angiographic, procedural, and clinical outcomes of STEMI patients treated with thrombus aspiration alone during pPCI.
- To analyze the histopathological characteristics and age of aspirated thrombus material to understand underlying pathological mechanisms.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of STEMI patients who underwent pPCI with thrombus aspiration as the sole intervention.
- Histopathological examination of aspirated thrombus material for thrombus age and plaque components.
- One-year clinical follow-up and vital status assessment.
Main Results:
- 16 STEMI patients were identified who underwent thrombus aspiration alone.
- 14 patients (88%) had acceptable flow with minimal residual stenosis post-aspiration.
- One-year follow-up showed one repeat target lesion revascularization and no recurrent myocardial infarction; two non-cardiac deaths occurred.
Conclusions:
- Thrombus aspiration alone is feasible and safe in selected STEMI patients undergoing pPCI, with no high risk of short-term recurrent ischemic events.
- Additional interventions like balloon angioplasty or stenting may be unnecessary in selected STEMI patients with minimal residual stenosis after thrombus aspiration.
Background:
In some patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutanous coronary intervention (pPCI) with thrombus aspiration, residual stenosis after thrombus aspiration is non-significant and additional balloon dilatation or stent placement may be unnecessary. We investigated the angiographic, procedural, and clinical outcomes of these patients in our single center pPCI-database. In addition, to gain insight in the pathological mechanisms of coronary thrombosis in these patients, we established the histopathological characteristics and age of the aspirated material.
Methods:
This study consists of STEMI patients who underwent pPCI with thrombus aspiration alone in our institution. Thrombus material was collected and processed and the sections were analyzed for the presence of fresh (<1 day) or older thrombus (>1 day) and plaque components. One year clinical follow-up was obtained and vital status was assessed up to March 2010.
Results:
We identified 16 STEMI patients who underwent thrombus aspiration alone as the definitive treatment during pPCI. Acceptable flow with minimal non-significant residual stenosis immediately after thrombus aspiration was present in 14 patients (88%). In four patients (25%) repeat angiography was performed after several days and disappearance of the residual thrombus could be confirmed in three patients. During follow-up, repeat target lesion revascularization was performed in one patient at 53 days. No recurrent myocardial infarction was observed. Two patients died 1,166 and 1,228 days after the index-event from non-cardiac causes.
Conclusions:
In selected STEMI patients undergoing pPCI, thrombus aspiration alone is feasible and safe on the short-term and there appears to be no high risk of recurrent ischemic events during follow-up. Our results suggest that additional balloon inflation or stent implantation may be unnecessary in selected patients, when there is no significant residual stenosis after thrombus aspiration.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
