Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP02:36

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP

Chromatin immunoprecipitation, or ChIP, is an antibody-based technique used to identify sites on DNA that bind to transcription factors of interest or histone proteins. It also helps determine the type of histone modifications such as acetylation, phosphorylation, or methylation.
Types of ChIP
ChIP can be divided into two types - X-ChIP and N-ChIP. X-ChIP involves in vivo cross-linking of histones and regulatory proteins to DNA, fragmenting the DNA by sonication, and isolating the protein-DNA...
Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression02:35

Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression

Chromatin is the massive complex of DNA and proteins packaged inside the nucleus. The complexity of chromatin folding and how it is packaged inside the nucleus greatly influences  access to genetic information. Generally, the nucleus' periphery is considered transcriptionally repressive, while the cell's interior is considered a transcriptionally active area. 
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the timing and level of...
General Transcription Factors01:30

General Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form dimers that...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mutant IDH1 blocks neutropoiesis by repressing myeloid progenitor programs.

Blood·2026
Same author

Dissecting the cellular architecture of breast cancer brain metastases reveals prognostically distinct immune landscapes.

Cancer cell·2026
Same author

Nucleosome spacing across cell types, diseases, and ages.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Fiber intake associates with increased treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma along with changes in gut microbiome.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Two distinct chromatin modules regulate proinflammatory gene expression.

Nature cell biology·2025
Same author

Current practices in the study of biomolecular condensates: a community comment.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Literature-informed gene extraction and ranking for multimodal data fusion.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SA-MTP: a structure-aware framework for multifunctional therapeutic peptide annotation.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Genome assemblies and annotations are not static and need support for tracking their evolution.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A historical journey of metabolite-protein interaction discovery: from data harmonization to AI-driven prediction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Bridging local-global transmembrane protein contexts with contrastive pretraining for alignment-free pathogenicity prediction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Prediction of drug hypersensitivity by comprehensive modeling of HLA-peptidomes.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

Calculating transcription factor binding maps for chromatin.

Vladimir B Teif1, Karsten Rippe

  • 1BioQuant and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. vladimir.teif@bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|July 9, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Calculating genome-wide transcription factor (TF) binding maps is computationally intensive. This study compares algorithms, developing a dynamic programming approach for TF binding in chromatin, considering nucleosomes and DNA unwrapping.

More Related Videos

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
12:54

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass
14:29

Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass

Published on: May 1, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
12:54

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass
14:29

Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass

Published on: May 1, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • High-throughput experiments generate extensive data on DNA sequence-dependent binding affinities of transcription factors (TF).
  • Predicting TF binding maps in a chromatin context remains computationally challenging due to factors like nucleosome competition and DNA unwrapping.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare different algorithmic approaches for calculating TF binding maps.
  • To develop and present an improved dynamic programming algorithm for TF binding prediction in chromatin.

Main Methods:

  • Consideration of DNA as a one-dimensional lattice.
  • Analysis of five algorithm classes: binary variable, combinatorial, sequence generating function, transfer matrix, and dynamic programming.
  • Development of a dynamic programming algorithm incorporating nucleosome occupancy and DNA unwrapping.

Main Results:

  • The binary variable algorithm's exponential time complexity limits its application to small genomic regions.
  • Transfer matrix and dynamic programming approaches are suitable for regulatory regions with overlapping binding sites.
  • The developed dynamic programming algorithm accounts for TF access to nucleosomal DNA.
  • Dynamic programming is faster than the transfer matrix method without nucleosomes, but the transfer matrix method is faster when nucleosome unwrapping is considered.

Conclusions:

  • Algorithmic advancements are crucial for accurate genome-wide TF binding map prediction.
  • The choice of algorithm depends on factors like DNA length, binding site overlap, and the inclusion of nucleosome dynamics.
  • Further strategies are needed to optimize calculations for large-scale genome-wide analyses.