Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Intestinal Epithelial Regeneration in Response to Ionizing Irradiation
Published on: July 27, 2022
Microbeam radiation-induced tissue damage depends on the stage of vascular maturation
Sara Sabatasso1, Jean Albert Laissue, Ruslan Hlushchuk
1Institute of Anatomy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Purpose:
To explore the effects of microbeam radiation (MR) on vascular biology, we used the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model of an almost pure vascular system with immature vessels (lacking periendothelial coverage) at Day 8 and mature vessels (with coverage) at Day 12 of development.
Methods And Materials:
CAMs were irradiated with microplanar beams (width, ∼25 μm; interbeam spacing, ∼200 μm) at entrance doses of 200 or 300 Gy and, for comparison, with a broad beam (seamless radiation [SLR]), with entrance doses of 5 to 40 Gy.
Results:
In vivo monitoring of Day-8 CAM vasculature 6 h after 200 Gy MR revealed a near total destruction of the immature capillary plexus. Conversely, 200 Gy MR barely affected Day-12 CAM mature microvasculature. Morphological evaluation of Day-12 CAMs after the dose was increased to 300 Gy revealed opened interendothelial junctions, which could explain the transient mesenchymal edema immediately after irradiation. Electron micrographs revealed cytoplasmic vacuolization of endothelial cells in the beam path, with disrupted luminal surfaces; often the lumen was engorged with erythrocytes and leukocytes. After 30 min, the capillary plexus adopted a striated metronomic pattern, with alternating destroyed and intact zones, corresponding to the beam and the interbeam paths within the array. SLR at a dose of 10 Gy caused growth retardation, resulting in a remarkable reduction in the vascular endpoint density 24 h postirradiation. A dose of 40 Gy damaged the entire CAM vasculature.
Conclusions:
The effects of MR are mediated by capillary damage, with tissue injury caused by insufficient blood supply. Vascular toxicity and physiological effects of MR depend on the stage of capillary maturation and appear in the first 15 to 60 min after irradiation. Conversely, the effects of SLR, due to the arrest of cell proliferation, persist for a longer time.
Insights
Microbeam radiation (MR) severely damages immature capillaries but spares mature ones, causing localized vascular injury. Broad beam radiation (SLR) causes widespread damage by inhibiting cell proliferation.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Biology
- Radiation Oncology
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model offers a unique system to study vascular biology due to its immature and mature vascular networks.
- Understanding the differential effects of radiation on vascular development is crucial for optimizing radiation therapies and minimizing side effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of microbeam radiation (MR) on vascular biology using the CAM model at different developmental stages (Day 8 immature vs. Day 12 mature vessels).
- To compare the effects of MR with conventional broad beam radiation (SLR) on vascular integrity and function.
Main Methods:
- Irradiation of CAMs with microplanar beams (25 μm width, 200 μm spacing) at 200-300 Gy and broad beams (SLR) at 5-40 Gy.
- In vivo monitoring of vascular response and morphological evaluation using light and electron microscopy.
- Assessment of vascular damage, interendothelial junction integrity, and cellular changes post-irradiation.
Main Results:
- 200 Gy MR caused near-complete destruction of immature Day-8 CAM capillaries but had minimal effect on mature Day-12 vessels.
- Higher MR doses (300 Gy) on Day-12 CAMs induced opened interendothelial junctions and transient edema, with endothelial cell vacuolization and luminal obstruction observed.
- MR created a metronomic pattern of damage, while 10 Gy SLR caused growth retardation and reduced vascular density, and 40 Gy SLR damaged the entire vasculature.
Conclusions:
- MR-induced tissue injury is primarily mediated by capillary damage, with effects dependent on capillary maturation stage and occurring rapidly (15-60 min post-irradiation).
- SLR effects, stemming from cell proliferation arrest, manifest over a longer duration compared to MR.
- The differential response highlights the importance of vascular maturity in determining radiation sensitivity.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Angiogenesis and Blood Supply
Biological Effects of Radiation
Mutations
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...
Vascular Spasm