Quickly 'learning' to move optimally
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats
Published on: June 22, 2015
Eli Brenner1, Jeroen B J Smeets
1Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.brenner@vu.nl
Abstract:
People take account of the variability in their movements in a near-optimal manner in various visuo-motor tasks. Is knowledge of one's variability needed for such near-optimal performance, or could it arise from responding to one's success in previous attempts in some simple manner? We asked subjects to move a pen back and forth across a tablet to make a cursor move as quickly as possible between two targets. The cursor had to stop within the targets. Task difficulty was varied between blocks. Part of the variation in difficulty was explicit (three target sizes) whereas the rest had to be discovered during the movements (two mappings between the movements of pen and cursor). In all cases, subjects sped up after stopping within a target and slowed down after failing to do so. We interpret this as evidence that explicit knowledge of one's variability is not necessary for performing close to optimally.
Related Concept Videos
Purposive Learning
Muscle Coordination and Action
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement.
Anatomical Movements
Here are some common anatomical movements:
Flexion and extension motions are in the sagittal (anterior–posterior) plane of motion. These movements take place at the shoulder, hip, elbow, knee, wrist, metacarpophalangeal,...
Observational Learning
Hierarchy of Motor Control
Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving

