Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a bonus...
Muscle Coordination and Action01:24

Muscle Coordination and Action

Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement.
Anatomical Movements00:51

Anatomical Movements

Anatomical movements refer to the various actions or motions that can be performed by the body's joints and muscles. These movements are described using specific terms to provide a standardized way of discussing and understanding the range of motion at different joints.
Here are some common anatomical movements:
Flexion and extension motions are in the sagittal (anterior–posterior) plane of motion. These movements take place at the shoulder, hip, elbow, knee, wrist, metacarpophalangeal,...
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving01:17

Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving

Rolling resistance, also known as rolling friction, is the force that resists the motion of a rolling object, such as a wheel, tire, or ball, when it moves over a surface. It is caused by the deformation of the object and the surface in contact with each other, as well as other factors like internal friction, hysteresis, and energy losses within the materials. Rolling resistance opposes the object's motion, requiring additional energy to overcome it and maintain movement. In practical...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Orchestrating gameplay in Dutch physical education: how and why teachers regulate task difficulty.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Detecting gaze shifts of moving observers in dynamic environments.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Perceptual grouping can affect the online control of goal-directed hand movements.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Evaluating lawful relationships in saccadic eye movements with simulated vision impairment: A proof-of-concept study.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

How prior motor states can shape perceptual decision bias: Insights from sensorimotor beta oscillations.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Chromatic induction and retinal image motion.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats
08:59

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

Quickly 'learning' to move optimally.

Eli Brenner1, Jeroen B J Smeets

  • 1Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.brenner@vu.nl

Experimental Brain Research
|July 13, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Optimal performance in visuo-motor tasks does not require explicit knowledge of movement variability. Simple feedback from success or failure in previous attempts is sufficient for near-optimal control.

More Related Videos

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats
08:59

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Cognitive psychology

Background:

  • Humans exhibit near-optimal control in visuo-motor tasks by adapting to movement variability.
  • It remains unclear whether this optimal performance relies on explicit knowledge of variability or simpler feedback mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether explicit knowledge of movement variability is essential for near-optimal performance in visuo-motor tasks.
  • To determine if performance improvements arise from explicit understanding or implicit feedback from task outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a task requiring rapid, accurate movements between targets using a pen tablet.
  • Task difficulty was manipulated through explicit target size variations and implicit changes in movement-cursor mappings.
  • Performance feedback was provided by cursor stopping within or outside target zones.

Main Results:

  • Subjects consistently adjusted movement speed based on success or failure in previous attempts.
  • Performance improved following successful trials and degraded after failed trials, irrespective of explicit difficulty information.
  • Participants demonstrated near-optimal speed adjustments without explicit knowledge of movement variability.

Conclusions:

  • Explicit knowledge of one's movement variability is not a prerequisite for achieving near-optimal performance in visuo-motor tasks.
  • Implicit feedback from trial outcomes (success/failure) is sufficient to drive adaptive, near-optimal motor control.
  • This suggests simpler, feedback-driven mechanisms underlie skilled motor behavior.