Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
Hair Cells01:22

Hair Cells

Hair cells are the sensory receptors of the auditory system—they transduce mechanical sound waves into electrical energy that the nervous system can understand. Hair cells are located in the organ of Corti within the cochlea of the inner ear, between the basilar and tectorial membranes. The actual sensory receptors are called inner hair cells. The outer hair cells serve other functions, such as sound amplification in the cochlea, and are not discussed in detail here.
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International expert consensus on gene therapy for hereditary hearing loss: Based on clinical trials.

Med (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Treating Hearing Loss: From Cochlear Implantation to Gene Therapy.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Clinical gene therapy restores hearing: a paradigm shift.

Trends in molecular medicine·2025
Same author

AAV gene therapy for autosomal recessive deafness 9: a single-arm trial.

Nature medicine·2025
Same author

Can cognitive performance predict individual differences in speech recognition at a cocktail party?

Hearing research·2025
Same author

Evaluating synthesized speech intelligibility in noise.

JASA express letters·2025
Same journal

Ultra-flexible wireless endovascular stimulator for cortical simulation.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

Influence of frequency and pulse train duration on respiratory responses during transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation in humans.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

Dynamic functional graph-Laplacian priors integrated with optimization for EEG source localization.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

Unveiling subject-specific causal latency in motor imagery: a physiologically transparent BCI via Riemannian tangent space fusion.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

Cross-subject decoding of human neural data for speech Brain Computer Interfaces.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

Cognitive and brain function enhancement in Gen X group after personalized, AI supervised EEG-neurofeedback training.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation
06:54

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Qing Tang1, Raul Benítez, Fan-Gang Zeng

  • 1Departments of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Sciences and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

Journal of Neural Engineering
|July 14, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants vary significantly between individuals. Reducing neural and higher-level interactions, not just electric field sharpening, is key to improving cochlear implant performance.

More Related Videos

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation
06:54

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Cochlear implants are successful neural prostheses for hearing restoration.
  • Individual performance varies, with limitations in noise and music perception.
  • Spatial channel interaction is a key factor in cochlear implant variability and performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically examine spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.
  • To investigate interactions at physical, physiological, and perceptual levels.
  • To develop quantitative indexes for spatial excitation patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Electric field imaging to measure voltage distribution.
  • Recording electrically evoked compound action potentials.
  • Perceptual testing using detection thresholds and loudness summation.

Main Results:

  • Electric field imaging showed broad, asymmetrical patterns.
  • Evoked potentials and perceptual data exhibited significant individual variability.
  • Quantitative indexes were developed to characterize spatial excitation patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Actual reduction in neural and higher-level interactions is crucial for improving cochlear implant performance.
  • Sharpening the electric current field alone may not be sufficient.
  • Findings apply to other neural prostheses where independent spatial channels are critical.