Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
The strategic nature of false recognition in the DRM paradigm
Michael B Miller1, Scott A Guerin, George L Wolford
1Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9660, USA. miller@psych.ucsb.edu
Abstract:
The false memory effect produced by the Deese/Roediger & McDermott (DRM) paradigm is reportedly impervious to warnings to avoid false alarming to the critical lures (D. A. Gallo, H. L. Roediger III, & K. B. McDermott, 2001). This finding has been used as strong evidence against models that attribute the false alarms to a decision process (e.g., M. B. Miller & G. L. Wolford, 1999). In this report, the authors clarify their earlier article and suggest that subjects establish only 2 underlying criteria for a recognition judgment, a liberal criterion for items that seem to be related to 1 of the study list themes and a conservative criterion for items that do not seem to be related. They demonstrate that warnings designed on the basis of these underlying criteria are effective in significantly suppressing the false recognition effect, suggesting that strategic control of the retrieval response does play a role in the DRM paradigm.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Understanding Deception
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
Nonconscious Mimicry

