Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HTSstation: a web application and open-access libraries for high-throughput sequencing data analysis.

PloS one·2014
Same author

Bacterial communities in women with bacterial vaginosis: high resolution phylogenetic analyses reveal relationships of microbiota to clinical criteria.

PloS one·2012
Same author

Statistics for the clinician: diagnostic questionnaires.

Journal of psychiatric practice·2011
Same journal

Pharmacy of the Mind: The Uncanny Origins of Psychiatric Drugs, and The World That Shaped Them.

Journal of psychiatric practice·2026
Same journal

Commentary on the Risks of Prescription GLP-1 Agonists in Patients on Psychiatric Medications.

Journal of psychiatric practice·2026
Same journal

A Case of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-Induced Lithium Neurotoxicity.

Journal of psychiatric practice·2026
Same journal

A Case of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-Induced Dysphoria and Aggression in a Patient With Underlying Major Depressive Disorder.

Journal of psychiatric practice·2026
Same journal

Dispositional Mindfulness and Perceived Stress in Psychiatric and Nonpsychiatric Physicians: A Facet-level Pilot Study.

Journal of psychiatric practice·2026
Same journal

Prescribing Under Pressure: History and Legal Insights Into Boxed Warnings for Psychotropic Drugs.

Journal of psychiatric practice·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Hypoxia Alters miRNAs Levels Involved in Non-Mendelian Inheritance of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mice
09:13

Hypoxia Alters miRNAs Levels Involved in Non-Mendelian Inheritance of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mice

Published on: July 11, 2025

Hypothesis tests and p-values.

Frederick J Ross1

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine at the University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.

Journal of Psychiatric Practice
|July 22, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This column clarifies statistical significance and hypothesis testing for clinicians. It explains p-values and debunks common misunderstandings using a fictional anti-insomnia drug study.

More Related Videos

Methodology to Metabolically Inactivate Bacteria for Caenorhabditis elegans Research
06:58

Methodology to Metabolically Inactivate Bacteria for Caenorhabditis elegans Research

Published on: July 28, 2023

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Hypoxia Alters miRNAs Levels Involved in Non-Mendelian Inheritance of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mice
09:13

Hypoxia Alters miRNAs Levels Involved in Non-Mendelian Inheritance of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mice

Published on: July 11, 2025

Methodology to Metabolically Inactivate Bacteria for Caenorhabditis elegans Research
06:58

Methodology to Metabolically Inactivate Bacteria for Caenorhabditis elegans Research

Published on: July 28, 2023

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Education

Background:

  • Understanding hypothesis testing is crucial for interpreting clinical study results.
  • P-values are frequently used but often misunderstood in medical research.
  • Misinterpretations can lead to flawed clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demystify the concept of p-values for practicing clinicians.
  • To explain the underlying principles of hypothesis testing.
  • To address common misconceptions surrounding p-values in clinical research.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes a fictional study of an anti-insomnia medication as a practical example.
  • Explains the statistical concepts of hypothesis testing in an accessible manner.
  • Focuses on conceptual understanding rather than complex mathematical derivations.

Main Results:

  • P-values indicate the probability of observing data as extreme as, or more extreme than, the results, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
  • Common misconceptions include interpreting p-values as the probability that the null hypothesis is true.
  • Statistical significance (often determined by a p-value threshold) does not equate to clinical significance.

Conclusions:

  • A clear understanding of p-values and hypothesis testing enhances the critical appraisal of medical literature.
  • Clinicians should be aware of common pitfalls in interpreting statistical results.
  • Accurate interpretation of statistical evidence supports evidence-based practice.