Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prioritizing Core Factors Needed to Sustain Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Programs: A Delphi Study.

Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine·2026
Same author

Clinical Standardization Across a National Health System: Perspectives From the Veterans Affairs' Electronic Health Record Transition.

Medical care·2026
Same author

Anticipating implementation: A mixed methods study of future prescribing determinants within an ongoing trial of clinical effectiveness.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation studies: why and how to do them.

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same author

Addressing Firearm Suicide Risk Reduction with an Online Patient Decision Aid Tailored to Women Veterans.

Journal of women's health (2002)·2026
Same author

A Gift of the Magi Paradox? Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Deprescribing.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Rethinking qualitative inquiry in implementation science: clarifying purpose, design, and rigor.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Clarifying dissemination outcomes: a taxonomy to advance dissemination science.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of a clinical practice guidelines implementability assessment tool (CPG-IAT) based on the COSMIN framework.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Embracing complexity by reducing rigidity: guiding principles for the intersection of implementation science and qualitative research.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Patterns of CDSS adoption in primary care: a cluster analysis and predictive modelling study from a stepped wedge trial.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Five years of the Implementation Research Logic Model: a citation analysis and systematic scoping review of its use in implementation research and practice.

Implementation science : IS·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Predicting implementation from organizational readiness for change: a study protocol.

Christian D Helfrich1, Dean Blevins, Jeffrey L Smith

  • 1Northwest Health Services Research & Development Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington, USA. christian.helfrich@va.gov

Implementation Science : IS
|July 23, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study validates the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment survey. It addresses halo and method bias to ensure reliable measurement of organizational readiness for evidence-based practices in healthcare.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Organizational Psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Measuring organizational readiness for evidence-based practices is crucial in healthcare.
  • Existing measures face challenges like halo and method bias, impacting validity.
  • A robust protocol is needed to assess and validate organizational readiness measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively assess the psychometric properties of the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) survey.
  • To specifically address and mitigate threats from halo effect and method bias in organizational research.
  • To enhance the reliability and validity of instruments measuring organizational readiness for change.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized longitudinal, secondary data from four clinical practice intervention projects.
  • Employed hierarchical linear modeling and multivariate regression for predictive and concurrent validity.
  • Assessed inter-rater reliability using intra-class correlations and content validity via expert panels.

Main Results:

  • The study protocol is designed to rigorously evaluate the ORCA survey's psychometric properties.
  • It incorporates specific methods to address halo and method bias, common in organizational research.
  • The validation process aims to ensure the ORCA survey accurately reflects organizational readiness.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive protocol for validating the ORCA survey has been proposed.
  • This protocol addresses critical threats to construct validity, including halo and method bias.
  • The findings will contribute to more accurate measurement of organizational readiness for implementing evidence-based practices.