Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs01:19

Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs

Following these guidelines can help nurses accurately measure vital signs, assess changes in patient conditions, and provide timely treatment when necessary. Adhering closely to the guidelines ensures the accuracy and reliability of the results.
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Temperature Measurement Sites01:14

Temperature Measurement Sites

A thermometer measures body temperature. The common sites for measuring body temperature are the oral cavity, axillary region, temporal artery, and skin surface, such as the forehead, abdomen, and axilla. True core body temperature is assessed in the rectum, tympanic membrane, pulmonary artery, esophagus, and urinary bladder.
Oral: When assessing oral temperature, the thermometer tip should be placed under the tongue in the posterior sublingual pocket. It offers accurate readings and can be...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and Assessment of a Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Gender-Affirming Care.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Patient Factors That Impact FACE-Q Aesthetics Outcomes: An Exploratory Cross-sectional Regression Analysis.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2025
Same author

Establishing Convergent Validity of the FACE-Q Aesthetics Module Scales.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2025
Same author

Quantitative Contribution of Clinical Attacks to Residual Disability in Patients With AQP4-Antibody Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

Neurology·2024
Same author

Measuring the Impact of Surgical and Non-surgical Facial Cosmetic Interventions Using FACE-Q Aesthetic Module Scales: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)·2024
Same author

Improving the Impact of BODY-Q Scores Through Minimal Important Differences in Body Contouring Surgery: An International Prospective Cohort Study.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

The problem with health measurement.

Stefan J Cano1, Jeremy C Hobart

  • 1Clinical Neurology Research Group, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Tamar Science Park, Plymouth, UK.

Patient Preference and Adherence
|July 28, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Health measurement relies on psychometric methods and rating scales. Current validity issues mean we must ensure scales accurately measure health outcomes for reliable clinical decisions.

Keywords:
health carehealth-related quality of lifeoutcome assessmentpatient-reported outcome instrumentspsychometricsquestionnaires

More Related Videos

Clinical Anthropometrics and Body Composition from 3-Dimensional Optical Imaging
06:48

Clinical Anthropometrics and Body Composition from 3-Dimensional Optical Imaging

Published on: June 7, 2024

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
15:00

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies

Published on: February 3, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

Clinical Anthropometrics and Body Composition from 3-Dimensional Optical Imaging
06:48

Clinical Anthropometrics and Body Composition from 3-Dimensional Optical Imaging

Published on: June 7, 2024

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
15:00

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies

Published on: February 3, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Health Measurement
  • Psychometric Methods
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Clinician and patient rating scales are increasingly vital for measuring health outcomes in disease and treatment.
  • The science of rating scales is well-established, with a century of development informing current practices.
  • Advancements in psychometric methods offer significant clinical advantages over traditional approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review health measurement focusing on psychometric methods and methodology.
  • To examine key issues in the use of clinician and patient rating scales for health outcomes.
  • To highlight the problem of uncertainty in what many rating scales actually measure.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on psychometric methods and health measurement.
  • Analysis of the application and interpretation of clinician and patient rating scales.
  • Examination of the validity of current rating scale methodologies.

Main Results:

  • Rating scales generate data increasingly used for critical clinical decisions.
  • Established psychometric science provides valuable lessons for scale development and use.
  • Newer psychometric methods present significant advantages for health measurement in practice.

Conclusions:

  • There is a crucial problem: the validity of many health rating scales is uncertain.
  • Current methods for ensuring scale validity are insufficient.
  • Further development and adoption of advanced psychometric approaches are needed to improve health measurement accuracy.