Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Direct Microbial Identification using An Automated Microbial Identification System to Facilitate the EUCAST RAST Method Without Mass Spectrometry
Published on: May 24, 2024
Evaluation of the Biolog system for the identification of certain closely related Pasteurella species
Boglárka Sellyei1, Eniko Wehmann, László Makrai
1Veterinary Medical Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1581 Budapest, Hungary.
Abstract:
The zoonotic impact of Pasteurella species in human wounds caused by cats and dogs has increased recently. In this study, the effectiveness of the Biolog Microstation ID System (Biolog, Hayward, CA) for the identification of certain species of Pasteurella sensu stricto was analysed. Thirty-eight isolates originating from dogs and cats were studied by pheno- and genotypic methods. The classical biochemical tests identified these isolates as P. multocida, P. dagmatis, and P. canis, while the Biolog system distinguished only 2 categories: P. multocida and P. dagmatis. The sodA gene sequence-based phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolates identified as P. dagmatis by the Biolog system were either P. dagmatis, P. canis, or P. dagmatis-like genomospecies. The low discrimination power of the Biolog system in the case of these closely related Pasteurella species draws attention to the need of continuously improving the database of automated microbial identification systems.
Insights
The Biolog Microstation ID System struggles to differentiate closely related Pasteurella species from cat and dog bites. Improved databases are needed for accurate identification of these zoonotic bacteria.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Microbiology
- Zoonotic Diseases
- Bacterial Identification
Background:
- Pasteurella species are significant zoonotic pathogens transmitted through animal bites.
- Accurate identification of Pasteurella species is crucial for effective treatment and public health.
- The Biolog Microstation ID System is a common tool for bacterial identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the Biolog Microstation ID System for identifying Pasteurella sensu stricto species.
- To compare Biolog system results with traditional phenotypic and genotypic methods.
- To assess the system's ability to differentiate closely related Pasteurella species.
Main Methods:
- Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of 38 Pasteurella isolates from dogs and cats.
- Identification using classical biochemical tests.
- Identification using the Biolog Microstation ID System.
- Phylogenetic analysis based on the sodA gene sequence.
Main Results:
- Classical tests identified P. multocida, P. dagmatis, and P. canis.
- The Biolog system only distinguished between P. multocida and P. dagmatis.
- Phylogenetic analysis revealed P. dagmatis isolates were actually P. dagmatis, P. canis, or P. dagmatis-like genomospecies.
- The Biolog system showed limited discriminatory power for these species.
Conclusions:
- The Biolog Microstation ID System has limitations in accurately identifying closely related Pasteurella species.
- Automated microbial identification systems require continuous database improvement for enhanced accuracy.
- Accurate identification of zoonotic Pasteurella species remains a challenge.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Classification and Identification
Rapid Identification of Pathogens

