Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automated differentials in the hematology laboratory.

J R Krause1

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|April 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Automated white blood cell differential analyzers offer accurate and efficient results, surpassing manual methods. These advanced instruments improve clinical diagnostics by reducing errors and costs associated with traditional blood cell counting.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are Tidal Salt Marshes Exposed to Nutrient Pollution more Vulnerable to Sea Level Rise?

Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)·2022
Same author

Molecular pathology in the diagnosis and treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

Journal of cellular and molecular medicine·2004
Same author

Kimura's disease: a case report.

Ear, nose, & throat journal·2000
Same author

Detection of hepatitis C virus RNA sequences in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2000
Same author

Morphology and classification of acute myeloid leukemias.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2000
Same author

der(1)t(1;19)(p12;p11): a new nonrandom chromosomal abnormality in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Cancer genetics and cytogenetics·1997

Area of Science:

  • Clinical laboratory science
  • Hematology
  • Medical diagnostics

Background:

  • The manual white blood cell differential is a common but error-prone and labor-intensive clinical laboratory procedure.
  • Limitations of manual differentials include sampling errors and subjective classification criteria, impacting clinical utility and increasing costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of automated leukocyte differential instrumentation compared to manual methods.
  • To highlight the advantages of automated systems in improving accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness in blood cell analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of results from state-of-the-art automated leukocyte differential analyzers with routine manual differentials.
  • Assessment of the ability of automated instruments to identify red blood cell and platelet parameters alongside white blood cell information.

Main Results:

  • Automated instrumentation provides results that are equal to or exceed the accuracy of the routine manual differential.
  • Automated systems effectively address common sources of error inherent in manual differential procedures.

Conclusions:

  • Automated leukocyte differential instrumentation offers a superior alternative to manual differentials, enhancing diagnostic accuracy.
  • These advanced instruments reduce the time, cost, and labor associated with manual blood cell analysis while improving the screening for significant abnormalities.

Related Experiment Videos