Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

09:31
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Does improved instrumentation result in better component alignment in total knee arthroplasty?
Mo Hassaballa1, Vijaya Budnar, Herbert Gbejuade
1Avon Orthopaedic centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Orthopedic Reviews
|August 3, 2011
Summary
The newer Xcelerate instrumentation kit improved joint line restoration in total knee replacement (TKR) compared to the older Gobot kit. However, overall differences in component alignment and joint line accuracy between the two TKR systems were minimal.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Radiographic Analysis
Background:
- Accurate component alignment and joint line restoration are critical for successful total knee replacement (TKR) outcomes.
- Advancements in instrumentation and biomechanical understanding aim to improve TKR component alignment and joint line restoration.
- Comparing different TKR instrumentation kits is essential for optimizing surgical techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of component alignment and joint line restoration between an older (Gobot) and a newer (Xcelerate) TKR instrumentation kit.
- To evaluate the impact of different instrumentation on radiographic outcomes in primary TKR.
- To determine if newer instrumentation leads to significant improvements in TKR accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 150 primary TKR patients.
- Patients were divided into two groups: 75 using Gobot (Group A) and 75 using Xcelerate (Group B).
- Pre- and post-operative X-rays were analyzed using the American Knee Society method for component positioning and Figgie's method for joint line position.
Main Results:
- The Gobot instrumentation resulted in significantly greater joint line elevation (4.49 mm) compared to Xcelerate (2.71 mm; P=0.03).
- Significant differences were observed in the mean tibial component angle (cTCA) and mean Q angle between the groups (P=0.04 for both).
- While Xcelerate showed better joint line restoration, femoral component flexion and tibial posterior slope exceeded desired levels in both groups, with small overall differences.
Conclusions:
- The newer Xcelerate instrumentation demonstrated improved joint line restoration accuracy in TKR compared to the older Gobot system.
- Despite some improvements, the overall clinical differences between the two TKR instrumentation kits were found to be small.
- Further research may be needed to refine instrumentation for optimal femoral and tibial component positioning in TKR.