Hydrodynamic methods for calibrating the normal spring constant of microcantilevers

Knowledge of the spring constants of microcantilevers is vital in atomic force microscopy and for cantilever-based devices that are, for example, employed as probes in biomedical applications. We compare two recently developed hydrodynamic methods for the determination of the normal spring constant of microcantilevers. Both approaches are non-invasive when determining the spring constant and require only knowledge of the thermal noise response of the cantilever in a fluid and its plan view dimensions. The methods do not bear the risk of damaging the cantilever and are therefore attractive for example in mass sensing applications in cases where the cantilever has been modified, e.g. with a coating. The specific strengths of the methods are discussed and the results for a variety of cantilevers are presented and compared.