Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

Extra-oral implants: insertion per- or post-ablation?

J P J Dings1, T J Maal, M S Muradin

  • 1Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 590, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, PO Box 9101, NL 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. j.dings@mka.umcn.nl

Oral Oncology
|August 13, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety and early organ preservation outcomes after dose escalation with MR-guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer (preRADAR): A phase I trial.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same author

The impact of age on quality of life, 90-day mortality, adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival after treatment for localized pancreatic cancer: A nationwide analysis.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same author

The challenge of informed consent: Propensity score weighting to prevent selection bias.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Prediction of pneumonia following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

The complication sum score: A Delphi-based approach to summarize treatment related complications for esophageal cancer.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration assessing clinical lymph node staging on radiotherapy treatment planning in esophageal cancer patients.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2025
Same journal

A salivary protein panel for detecting malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia.

Oral oncology·2026
Same journal

Technical and therapeutic evaluation of endoscopic treatment of early papillary thyroid cancer through oral vestibular approach.

Oral oncology·2026
Same journal

Implementation-focused consensus recommendations for oral cavity cancer prevention and early detection in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Delphi study.

Oral oncology·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Malignant transformation of verrucous oral potentially malignant disorders at a tertiary referral centre: A retrospective cohort study".

Oral oncology·2026
Same journal

Re: Ensemble learning-based radiomics model for predicting radiation-induced temporal lobe injury in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Oral oncology·2026
Same journal

Lymphedema therapy in head & neck cancer with carotid stenosis: a systematic review and care pathway.

Oral oncology·2026
See all related articles

Extra-oral implants placed during tumor ablation surgery show a higher survival rate than those placed after. This finding emphasizes the benefit of immediate implant placement for maxillofacial reconstruction.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Oncology
  • Biomaterials

Background:

  • Extra-oral implants are crucial for reconstructing maxillofacial defects after cancer surgery.
  • Optimal timing for implant placement requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the survival rates of extra-oral implants placed during ablation (DA-implants) versus after ablation (AA-implants).
  • To determine the impact of surgical timing on implant success in maxillofacial reconstruction.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 103 extra-oral implants (44 nasal, 59 orbital) in 35 patients.
  • Implant survival was assessed over a mean follow-up of 35 months (range 8-156 months).
  • Comparison of survival rates between DA-implants and AA-implants in nasal and orbital regions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

Main Results:

  • DA-implants demonstrated higher survival rates: 90.0% (orbital) and 93.5% (nasal).
  • AA-implants showed lower survival rates: 82.8% (orbital) and 61.5% (nasal).
  • A statistically significant higher survival rate was observed for DA-implants (p=0.044).

Conclusions:

  • Extra-oral implants placed during ablative surgery have a significantly better survival rate.
  • Immediate implant placement during tumor ablation is recommended for improved outcomes in maxillofacial reconstruction.