Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A visual search asymmetry for plaids.

Perception·2025
Same author

RIPK3 in necroptosis and cancer.

Molecules and cells·2025
Same author

Individual differences in direction-selective motion adaptation revealed by change-detection performance.

Vision research·2024
Same author

NAMPT-Driven M2 Polarization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages Leads to an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Colorectal Cancer.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2024
Same author

Monocular and binocular mechanisms detect modulations of dot density and dot contrast.

Vision research·2023
Same author

New Approaches to 3D Vision.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2022
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Effects of color-enhancing filters on color salience in normal trichromats.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Wohlgemuth was right: distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect.

Michael J Morgan1

  • 1Max-Planck Neurological Institute, Koeln, Germany. Michael.Morgan@nf.mpg.de

Vision Research
|August 16, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Distracting attention during visual motion adaptation did not reduce the motion after-effect. This suggests attentional load does not impact motion perception sensitivity, contrary to prior research.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Motion after-effects demonstrate neural adaptation to visual motion stimuli.
  • The role of attention in modulating sensory adaptation remains debated.
  • Previous studies suggested attention influences adaptation, but used less rigorous methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if attentional load during motion adaptation affects the motion after-effect.
  • To use a bias-free method to quantify adaptation strength.
  • To clarify the relationship between attention, sensitivity, and adaptation in visual motion perception.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) procedure for bias-free measurement of contrast discrimination.
  • Measured adaptation by assessing the effect of a moving grating on contrast discrimination functions.
  • Manipulated attentional load using a distracting task during the adaptation phase.

Main Results:

  • Motion adaptation consistently shifted contrast discrimination functions, indicating adaptation.
  • Increased attentional load during adaptation did not significantly alter contrast discrimination or detection thresholds.
  • No consistent effect of attentional load on the strength of motion adaptation was observed.

Conclusions:

  • Attentional load during adaptation does not appear to modulate sensitivity in motion perception.
  • Observed effects in prior studies may be attributable to response biases rather than genuine changes in sensitivity.
  • This study provides evidence against a significant role for attention in modulating visual motion adaptation sensitivity.