Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Disorders of the Male Reproductive System01:20

Disorders of the Male Reproductive System

Men's health issues are increasingly recognized as significant, with several conditions posing common threats. Among these, testicular cancer is especially prevalent in younger men, particularly those aged 20 to 35 years. The disease often manifests as a painless mass in the testicles, sometimes accompanied by a sensation of heaviness or a dull ache.
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra. Symptoms...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved prostate cancer grading by incorporating Gleason pattern quantification, invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma in the new QUICC-score.

Annals of diagnostic pathology·2026
Same author

Who, When, and How: Watchful Waiting in the ERSPC Rotterdam.

European urology open science·2026
Same author

Prostate cancer mortality among men with and without comorbidity: Long-term results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer Rotterdam.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same author

Cell-Based Immunization Combined with Single-Round Cell Panning Enables Discovery of PSMA-Targeting Nanobodies from Phage Display Libraries.

Biomolecules·2026
Same author

Targeted Prostate Cancer Screening in Carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 Pathogenic Germline Variants Detects Clinically Relevant Disease: 5-year Results from the IMPACT Study.

European urology·2026
Same author

Extending Current Guideline-recommended Prostate-specific Antigen Density Thresholds for Improving Benefit/Harm Balance in Risk-based Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, from the Community-based Multicentre MR-PROPER Study.

European urology oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
13:19

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer

Published on: November 2, 2013

Towards an optimal interval for prostate cancer screening.

Pim J van Leeuwen1, Monique J Roobol, Ries Kranse

  • 1Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. p.vanleeuwen@erasmusmc.nl

European Urology
|August 16, 2011
PubMed
Summary

A 2-year screening interval for prostate cancer (PCa) significantly reduced advanced cancer incidence but increased low-risk diagnoses. Individualized screening strategies are needed for optimal PCa management.

More Related Videos

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
13:19

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer

Published on: November 2, 2013

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) screening program effectiveness is often estimated by the rate of decrease in advanced cancers.
  • Determining optimal screening intervals is crucial for balancing early detection with overdiagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the effectiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) screening programs utilizing either a 2-year or a 4-year screening interval.
  • To compare the incidence of advanced and low-risk PCa between different screening frequencies.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving men aged 55-64 years at two European centers (Gothenburg, Sweden; Rotterdam, Netherlands).
  • Participants were allocated to either a 2-year (n=4202) or 4-year (n=13,301) screening interval.
  • Follow-up extended up to 12 years, with advanced cancer defined by clinical stage, PSA levels, or Gleason score.

Main Results:

  • The proportional advanced cancer incidence was lower in the 2-year interval group (Gothenburg) compared to the 4-year interval group (Rotterdam) (RR: 0.57; p=0.048).
  • Conversely, the relative risk for detection of low-risk PCa was higher in the 2-year interval group (RR: 1.46; p<0.001).
  • Overall proportional cancer incidence was higher with the 2-year interval (3.64) versus the 4-year interval (3.08) (RR: 1.18; p=0.009).

Conclusions:

  • A 2-year screening interval effectively reduces the incidence of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) in men aged 55-64.
  • However, a 2-year interval leads to a higher risk of diagnosing low-risk PCa compared to a 4-year interval.
  • Improved individualized screening algorithms are necessary to optimize PCa screening strategies and mitigate overdiagnosis.