Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scanning Electron Microscopy01:07

Scanning Electron Microscopy

A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to study the surface features of a sample by using an electron beam that scans the sample surface in a two-dimensional manner. Typically, areas between ~1 centimeter to 5 micrometers in width can be imaged. SEM can be used to image bacteria, viruses, tissues as well as larger samples like insects. Conventional SEM gives a magnification ranging from 20X to 30,000X and spatial resolution of 50 to 100 nanometers.
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
Determination of Crystal Structures01:29

Determination of Crystal Structures

In the late 1800s, the revelation that light extended beyond visible wavelengths led to the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Roentgen. Recognized as high-energy electromagnetic radiation with short wavelengths, X-rays prompted exploration into their interaction with crystals. Max von Laue proposed in 1912 that the periodic arrangement of atoms, ions, or molecules in crystals would cause them to diffract X-rays, a hypothesis confirmed through experiments with copper sulfate and zinc sulfide...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adherence to Healthy Eating Index-2015 and severity of disease in hospitalised military patients with COVID-19: a cross sectional study.

BMJ military health·2022
Same author

The efficacy of probiotics in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (an animal model for MS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Letters in applied microbiology·2021
Same author

Effects of synbiotic supplementation on the components of metabolic syndrome in military personnel: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.

BMJ military health·2020
Same author

Interaction of carvacroland voriconazole against drug - resistant Candida strains isolated from patients with candidiasis.

Journal de mycologie medicale·2018
Same author

Quantitative comparison using Generalized Relative Object Detectability (G-ROD) metrics of an amorphous selenium detector with high resolution Microangiographic Fluoroscopes (MAF) and standard flat panel detectors (FPD).

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2017
Same author

Evaluation of antioxidant and antifungal properties of the traditional plants against foodborne fungal pathogens.

Journal de mycologie medicale·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Single-layer and dual-layer contrast-enhanced mammography using amorphous selenium flat panel detectors.

N Allec1, S Abbaszadeh, K S Karim

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Canada. nallec@uwaterloo.ca

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|August 20, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study compares single-layer and dual-layer detectors for contrast-enhanced mammography. The single-layer detector demonstrated superior lesion detectability and contrast, even with potential motion artifacts.

More Related Videos

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes
11:19

Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes

Published on: March 20, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes
11:19

Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes

Published on: March 20, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) utilizes injected contrast agents for lesion enhancement.
  • Image acquisition in CEM involves combining two images, with methods like dual-energy subtraction susceptible to motion artifacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate single-layer and dual-layer detectors for CEM using amorphous selenium.
  • To determine optimal system parameters for both detector types.
  • To compare detector performance based on contrast agent concentration, tumor size, and radiation dose.

Main Methods:

  • Amorphous selenium detectors were used for evaluating single-layer (dual-energy subtraction) and dual-layer (simultaneous acquisition) methods.
  • System parameters including tube voltage, filtration, photoconductor thickness, and relative intensity ratio were optimized.
  • Detector performance was assessed by varying contrast agent concentration, tumor size, and radiation dose.

Main Results:

  • The single-layer detector exhibited superior spectral separation, leading to better contrast and lower quantum noise.
  • Detectability was comparable at lower evaluated factors (contrast agent concentration, tumor size, dose).
  • The single-layer detector showed 2.4 times greater detectability for a 2.5 mm tumor with 1.5 mg/mL contrast agent in a 4.5 cm breast.

Conclusions:

  • The single-layer detector offers improved lesion detectability and image quality in contrast-enhanced mammography.
  • Further research is ongoing to incorporate motion artifacts into the comparative analysis.