Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Measurement of Ultrafast Vibrational Coherences in Polyatomic Radical Cations with Strong-Field Adiabatic Ionization
Published on: August 6, 2018
Second-order nonadiabatic couplings from time-dependent density functional theory: evaluation in the immediate
Chunping Hu1, Osamu Sugino, Kazuyuki Watanabe
1Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan. hu@rs.kagu.tus.ac.jp
Abstract:
For a rigorous quantum simulation of nonadiabatic dynamics of electrons and nuclei, knowledge of not only the first-order but also the second-order nonadiabatic couplings (NACs) is required. Here, we propose a method to efficiently calculate the second-order NAC from time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT), on the basis of the Casida ansatz adapted for the computation of first-order NAC, which has been justified in our previous work and can be shown to be valid for calculating second-order NAC between ground state and singly excited states within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation. Test calculations of the second-order NAC in the immediate vicinity of Jahn-Teller and Renner-Teller intersections show that calculation results from TDDFT, combined with modified linear response theory, agree well with the prediction from the Jahn-Teller/Renner-Teller models. Contrary to the diverging behavior of the first-order NAC near all types of intersection points, the Cartesian components of the second-order NAC are shown to be negligibly small near Renner-Teller glancing intersections, while they are significantly large near the Jahn-Teller conical intersections. Nevertheless, the components of the second-order NAC can cancel each other to a large extent in Jahn-Teller systems, indicating the background of neglecting the second-order NAC in practical dynamics simulations. On the other hand, it is shown that such a cancellation becomes less effective in an elliptic Jahn-Teller system and thus the role of second-order NAC needs to be evaluated in the rigorous framework. Our study shows that TDDFT is promising to provide accurate data of NAC for full quantum mechanical simulation of nonadiabatic processes.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Reaction Mechanisms: The Steady-State Approximation

