Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bone Cells and Tissue

Bone Cells and Tissue

Bones contain a relatively small number of cells entrenched in a matrix of organic and inorganic components. Although bone cells compose only a small amount of the bone volume, they are crucial to its function. Four types of cells are found within the bone tissue— osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteogenic cells, and osteoclasts.
Osteoblasts and Osteocytes
The osteoblast is the bone cell responsible for forming new bone tissue. It is found in the growing portions of bone, including the periosteum and...

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during bone...

Bone Remodeling

Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Fibronectin composition and transglutaminase 2 cross-linking cooperatively regulate ovarian cancer cell adhesion in ECM-mimetic constructs.

Acta biomaterialia·2025

Same author

Extracellular Matrix Dynamics in Aortic Valve Health and Disease: Insights into Fibrocalcific Remodeling and Creation of Biomimetic Platforms.

Journal of the Heart Valve Society·2025

Same author

Developing sex-accurate cell culture environments.

Nature reviews bioengineering·2025

Same author

Fibronectin Composition and Transglutaminase 2 Cross-linking Cooperatively Regulate Ovarian Cancer Cell Adhesion in ECM-Mimetic Constructs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Collagen fiber density observed in metastatic ovarian cancer promotes tumor cell adhesion.

Acta biomaterialia·2025

Same author

Hypoxia modulates human pulmonary arterial adventitial fibroblast phenotype through HIF-1α activation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Isolation and Characterization of Primary Rat Valve Interstitial Cells: A New Model to Study Aortic Valve Calcification

Isolation and Characterization of Primary Rat Valve Interstitial Cells: A New Model to Study Aortic Valve Calcification

Published on: November 20, 2017

Can valvular interstitial cells become true osteoblasts? A side-by-side comparison.

Elyssa L Monzack¹, Kristyn S Masters

¹Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

The Journal of Heart Valve Disease

|August 26, 2011

Summary

Valvular interstitial cells (VICs) do not appear to progress through a myofibroblastic stage before becoming osteoblast-like during aortic valve calcification. VICs showed distinct gene expression patterns compared to osteoblasts in experimental conditions.

More Related Videos

Isolation of Mouse Interstitial Valve Cells to Study the Calcification of the Aortic Valve In Vitro

Isolation of Mouse Interstitial Valve Cells to Study the Calcification of the Aortic Valve In Vitro

Published on: May 10, 2021

Isolation of Human Primary Valve Cells for In vitro Disease Modeling

Isolation of Human Primary Valve Cells for In vitro Disease Modeling

Published on: April 16, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Isolation and Characterization of Primary Rat Valve Interstitial Cells: A New Model to Study Aortic Valve Calcification

Isolation and Characterization of Primary Rat Valve Interstitial Cells: A New Model to Study Aortic Valve Calcification

Published on: November 20, 2017

Isolation of Mouse Interstitial Valve Cells to Study the Calcification of the Aortic Valve In Vitro

Isolation of Mouse Interstitial Valve Cells to Study the Calcification of the Aortic Valve In Vitro

Published on: May 10, 2021

Isolation of Human Primary Valve Cells for In vitro Disease Modeling

Isolation of Human Primary Valve Cells for In vitro Disease Modeling

Published on: April 16, 2021

Area of Science:

Cardiovascular Biology
Cellular Differentiation
Biomineralization

Background:

Aortic valve calcification involves valvular interstitial cells (VICs) differentiating into myofibroblastic or osteoblast-like phenotypes.
Direct comparisons between VICs and osteoblasts are limited, hindering understanding of VIC differentiation pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the differentiation of VICs against various osteoblastic cell types.
To determine if VICs transition through a myofibroblastic phenotype before adopting an osteoblast-like profile.

Main Methods:

VICs were cultured alongside embryonic fibroblasts, pre-osteoblasts, and mature osteoblasts.
Cells were exposed to mineralization medium for up to eight days.
Gene and protein expression (alpha-SMA, ALP, osteocalcin) were analyzed via qPCR and other assays.

Main Results:

Mineralization medium decreased alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) in VICs, without a peak expression.
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased in all cell types, but significantly less in VICs compared to osteogenic cells.
Osteocalcin, a late-stage marker, increased only in osteogenic cell types, not VICs.

Conclusions:

VICs exhibit distinct expression patterns of mineralization and myofibroblast markers compared to osteoblastic cells.
The absence of increased alpha-SMA suggests VICs may not require a myofibroblastic stage for osteoblast-like differentiation.
Findings challenge the proposed sequential differentiation model for VICs in aortic valve calcification.