Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026
05:15
Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
Published on: December 23, 2022
Comparison of two different suture methods in laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty
Pengfei Shao1, Chao Qin, Xiaobing Ju
1Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Urologia Internationalis
|August 26, 2011
Summary
Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty is effective for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Using running sutures improves surgical efficiency and reduces complications compared to interrupted sutures.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Techniques
Background:
- Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) repair via laparoscopy is complex.
- Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty is a standard treatment for UPJO.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present experience with laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
- To compare clinical outcomes of interrupted versus running suture techniques in UPJO repair.
Main Methods:
- 105 laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasties performed via retroperitoneal approach.
- Patients divided into two groups based on suture technique: interrupted or running.
- Data collected on operative time, blood loss, and complications.
Main Results:
- All procedures completed laparoscopically without open conversion.
- Running sutures significantly decreased operation and anastomosis times.
- Total complication rate was 7.6% with no anastomotic strictures; hydronephrosis resolved in all cases.
Conclusions:
- Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty offers satisfactory outcomes for UPJO.
- The running suture technique enhances surgical efficiency and lowers complication rates.