Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variation01:19

Variation

An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the sensitivity of the probability of error rule for feature selection.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2012
Same author

Contextual template matching: a distance measure for patterns with hierarchically dependent features.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same author

Evaluating Multimembership Classifiers: A Methodology and Application to the MEDAS Diagnostic System.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same author

Pattern-Based Interactive Diagnosis of Multiple Disorders: The MEDAS System.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same author

Clinical decision making during resuscitation and guidelines for termination of the resuscitation effort.

Minerva anestesiologica·2003
Same author

Optimizing timing of ventricular defibrillation.

Critical care medicine·2002
Same journal

HardFlow: Hard-Constrained Sampling for Flow-Matching Models Via Trajectory Optimization.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Industrial Brain: Self-Evolving Neuro-Symbolic Autonomy with Causal Resilience for Cyber-Physical Systems.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Hardness-Driven Dictionary Distillation for Incomplete Streaming View Clustering.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Mixture of Global and Local Experts with Diffusion Transformer for Controllable Face Generation.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Task-KV: Task-aware KV Cache Optimization via Semantic Differentiation of Attention Heads.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Achieving Text-based Person Retrieval with Any Granularity.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Sensitivity analysis in bayesian classification models: multiplicative deviations.

M Ben-Bassat1, K L Klove, M H Weil

  • 1Institute of Critical Care Medicine and the Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90027; Faculty of Management.

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
|August 27, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian pattern recognition models are robust to significant deviations in probability values. These models maintain accurate classifications even when prior and conditional probabilities vary widely, making them reliable for real-world applications.

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Pattern Recognition
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Bayesian models are widely used in pattern recognition.
  • Model sensitivity to inaccurate probability estimates is a concern.
  • Understanding this sensitivity is crucial for reliable classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the sensitivity of Bayesian pattern recognition models to multiplicative deviations in prior and conditional probabilities.
  • To derive formulas for correcting posterior probability deviations.
  • To quantify the impact of probability deviations on classification accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical derivation of formulas for the deviation factor K.
  • Numerical analysis using binary features.
  • Simulation of varying prior and conditional probabilities.

Main Results:

  • Explicit formulas were derived to correct for probability deviations.
  • Bayesian models demonstrated tolerance to large deviations (65-135%) in probabilities.
  • Posterior probabilities remained within ±0.10 accuracy despite significant deviations.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian pattern recognition systems are robust to inaccuracies in probability estimates.
  • This robustness supports the use of Bayesian models with limited data or subjective probabilities.
  • High classification accuracy is achievable even with imperfect probability inputs.