Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Bootstrapping01:24

Bootstrapping

The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is small or...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Profiling CARD14 gene expression in Indian Psoriasis patients.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Exploring the diversity of virulence genes in the <i>Magnaporthe</i> population infecting millets and rice in India.

Frontiers in plant science·2023
Same author

The Implementation of a Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) Program at a Level 1 New England Trauma Center: Feasibility and Early Outcomes.

The American surgeon·2023
Same author

Added value of the measles-rubella supplementary immunization activity in reaching unvaccinated and under-vaccinated children, a cross-sectional study in five Indian districts, 2018-20.

Vaccine·2022
Same author

Deep learning model for predicting tunnel damages and track serviceability under seismic environment.

Modeling earth systems and environment·2022
Same author

Role of GeneXpertMTB/RIF in the diagnosis of cutaneous tuberculosis.

The Indian journal of tuberculosis·2022
Same journal

TraGraph-GS: Trajectory Graph-based Gaussian Splatting for Arbitrary Large-Scale Scene Rendering.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

SWIFT: A Small-World Interaction Framework for Flow-Aware Trajectory Prediction in Autonomous Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

HardFlow: Hard-Constrained Sampling for Flow-Matching Models Via Trajectory Optimization.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Industrial Brain: Self-Evolving Neuro-Symbolic Autonomy with Causal Resilience for Cyber-Physical Systems.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Hardness-Driven Dictionary Distillation for Incomplete Streaming View Clustering.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Mixture of Global and Local Experts with Diffusion Transformer for Controllable Face Generation.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Bootstrap techniques for error estimation.

A K Jain1, R C Dubes, C C Chen

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
|August 27, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces bootstrap techniques for more reliable error estimation in pattern recognition systems. Bootstrapping offers smaller confidence intervals for error rates compared to traditional methods like leave-one-out.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Statistics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Classifier performance is critically evaluated by error rate estimation.
  • Traditional methods like holdout, resubstitution, and leave-one-out exhibit bias or variance issues.
  • The statistical properties of estimators are often unknown with limited data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the application of bootstrap techniques for error rate estimation in pattern recognition.
  • To compare bootstrap error estimation with traditional methods for 1-NN and quadratic classifiers.
  • To assess the performance of bootstrap estimators on real-world datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Resampling techniques (bootstrapping) were applied to estimate classification error rates.
  • Evaluated bootstrap methods for 1-Nearest Neighbor (1-NN) and quadratic classifiers.
  • Compared bootstrap confidence intervals with leave-one-out estimators.

Main Results:

  • Bootstrap techniques provide a viable method for error rate estimation in pattern recognition.
  • Bootstrap estimators generally yield smaller confidence intervals than leave-one-out.
  • Error rates for 1-NN, quadratic, and Fisher classifiers were estimated on real datasets.

Conclusions:

  • Bootstrapping is a powerful tool for statistical inference in pattern recognition when distributions are unknown.
  • The study demonstrates the utility of bootstrap methods for improving classifier error estimation.
  • Further research can leverage bootstrapping for more robust classifier design.