Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

07:06
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
Published on: March 29, 2022
[Correlation between visual field index values and mean deviation values of Humphrey field analyzer]
Satoshi Kimura1, Tairo Kimura, Koichi Ono
1Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Japan. stkimura@juntendo.ac.jp
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi
|September 3, 2011
Summary
This study found a significant correlation between the visual field index (VFI) and mean deviation (MD) in all eyes. However, the correlation between VFI slope and MD slope was not evident in paracentral defects, suggesting careful evaluation is needed for central visual field progression.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Visual electrophysiology
Context:
- Glaucoma and other optic neuropathies can cause progressive visual field loss.
- The visual field index (VFI) and mean deviation (MD) are common metrics for quantifying visual field damage.
- Understanding the relationship between VFI and MD, and their slopes, is crucial for monitoring disease progression.
Purpose:
- To investigate the correlation between the visual field index (VFI) and mean deviation (MD).
- To analyze the correlation between the VFI slope and MD slope.
- To assess the agreement between VFI slope and MD slope across different visual field defect patterns.
Summary:
- A significant correlation was observed between MD and VFI across all eyes, including those with visual field defects.
- The correlation between VFI slope and MD slope was significant overall but not evident in paracentral defects.
- A moderate agreement was found between VFI slope and MD slope using kappa statistics.
Impact:
- The findings highlight the strong association between VFI and MD in assessing visual field status.
- The lack of correlation in paracentral defects suggests that VFI and MD slopes may not be interchangeable for evaluating progression in this specific region.
- This research emphasizes the need for careful consideration when evaluating central visual field defect progression using these metrics.

