Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Mental contamination: the perpetrator effect
S Rachman1, Adam S Radomsky, Corinna M Elliott
1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. rachman@interchange.ubc.ca
Abstract:
In order to test the proposition that imagining carrying out an unacceptable non-consensual act can evoke contamination-related feelings in the perpetrator, 4 connected experiments were carried out involving male students. The effects of the experimental procedure were enhanced by the introduction of a theme of betrayal which boosted the feelings of contamination and urges to wash. The non-consensual scenarios were followed by substantial increases in negative emotions, notably shame, disgust and guilt, and these increases were boosted over successive enhancements of the procedure. Overall the results show that perpetrators of (imagined) unacceptable acts report a range of negative emotions and feelings of dirtiness. The main conclusion of this research is that imagining an unacceptable, non-consensual act can produce feelings of contamination. It is an experimental illustration of mental contamination, that is, contamination which is evoked by a mental event without any contact with a tangible contaminant.
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Actor-Observer Effect
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Correspondence Bias

