[Low sensitivity of the echocardiograph compared with contrast transcranial Doppler in right-to-left shunt]

P Martínez-Sánchez1, J Medina-Báez, M Lara-Lara

  • 1Laboratorio de Exploración Neurovascular Ultrasonográfica, Servicio de Neurología y Centro de Ictus, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación IdiPAZ, Madrid, España. patrindalo@hotmail.com

Insights

Contrast transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) is more sensitive for detecting right-to-left shunts (RLS) than transthoracic (TTE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Echocardiography methods yield numerous false negatives, making c-TCD the preferred diagnostic tool for suspected paradoxical embolism.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Neurology
  • Diagnostic Techniques

Background:

  • Contrast transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) demonstrates high sensitivity for detecting right-to-left shunts (RLS).
  • Its sensitivity is likely superior to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and comparable to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of TTE and TEE in detecting RLS.
  • To compare the accuracy of echocardiographic methods with c-TCD.

Main Methods:

  • An observational study included 115 patients under 55 with cryptogenic cerebral ischemia.
  • Patients underwent c-TCD at rest and during Valsalva maneuver (VM), with TTE and TEE performed as per protocol.
  • Accuracy was determined by comparing TTE and TEE results against c-TCD findings.

Main Results:

  • c-TCD detected RLS in 67.6% of patients, significantly more than TTE (22.5%) or TEE (53.1%).
  • TTE after VM showed 31.8% sensitivity and 52.9% accuracy for RLS detection.
  • TEE after VM demonstrated 63.4% sensitivity and 67.9% accuracy, with improved performance at rest.

Conclusions:

  • TTE and TEE exhibit a significant rate of false negatives in RLS detection.
  • c-TCD is recommended as the optimal diagnostic method for RLS when paradoxical embolism is suspected.
Abstract