Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2026

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
Published on: January 18, 2013
Differences in children's peer sociometric and attribution ratings due to context and type of aggressive behavior
1Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-6040.
Abstract:
Sociometric and attribution (internality and responsibility) ratings of boys performing different kinds of aggression (hostile and instrumental hitting and pushing) and of neutral behavior occurring in two contexts (provoked and unprovoked) were investigated in an analogue fashion. Thirty fifth- and sixth-grade boys viewed and rated 12 brief videotaped scenes of two unfamiliar male peers interacting, presented in one of six random orders. Provoked aggression resulted in less dislike, less worthiness of punishment, and greater attribution to external causes than unprovoked aggression. Instrumental and hostile aggression produced lower liking ratings and were viewed as more deserving of punishment than neutral behavior but did not differ from each other. Results support distinctions between provoked and unprovoked aggression but not between hostile and instrumental aggression, at least in terms of their functional impact on peer judgements.
Related Concept Videos
Attribution Theory
Bullying
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Sibling Relationships During Infancy and Toddlerhood
Relationships with Peers During Infancy and Toddlerhood

