Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
A systematical comparison of DFT methods in reproducing the interaction energies of halide series with protein
Xiuhong Liu1, Peng Zhou, Zhicai Shang
1Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Abstract:
A systematic theoretical investigation on the interaction energies of halogen-ionic bridges formed between halide ions and the polar H atoms bonded to N of protein moieties has been carried out by employing a variety of density functional methods. In this procedure, full geometry optimizations are performed at the Møller-Plesset second-order perturbation (MP2) level of theory in conjunction with the Dunning's augmented correlation-consistent basis set, aug-cc-pVDZ. Subsequently, two distinct basis sets, i.e. 6-311++G(df,pd) and aug-cc-pVTZ, are employed in the following single-point calculations so as to check the stability of the results obtained at the different levels of DFT. The performance of DFT methods has been evaluated by comparing the results with those obtained from the rigorous MP2 theory. It is shown that the B98, B97-1, and M05 give the lowest root-mean-square error (RMSE) for predicting fluoride-binding energies, M05-2X, MPW1B95, and MPW1PW91 have the best performance in reproducing chloride-binding energies, B97-1, PBEKCIS, and PBE1KCIS present the optimal result for bromide-binding energies, while B97-1, MPW1PW91, and TPSS perform most well on iodide-binding energies. The popular B3LYP functional seems to be quite modest for studying halide-protein moiety interactions. In addition, the PBE1KCIS functional provide accuracies close to the computationally expensive MP2 method for the calculation of interaction energies of all halide-binding systems.
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...

