Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026
06:13
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implications
Nitin Chauhan1, Ashlin J Alexander, Ali Sepehr
1Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto. Nitin.chauhan@utoronto.ca
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
|September 13, 2011
Summary
Primary rhinoplasty patients seek smaller noses, while revision patients often have concerns about crookedness and asymmetry. Understanding these differences can help surgeons improve outcomes and reduce revision rates.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Otolaryngology
- Facial Plastic Surgery
Background:
- Rhinoplasty patients have specific aesthetic and functional concerns.
- Patient expectations can be exacting, influencing surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze patient complaints during rhinoplasty consultations.
- To compare concerns between primary and revision rhinoplasty patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 400 rhinoplasty patients.
- Demographic data and patient concerns were recorded and analyzed.
- Complaint frequencies were compared between primary and revision groups using logistic regression.
Main Results:
- Primary rhinoplasty concerns: "too large" nose, "dorsal hump".
- Revision rhinoplasty concerns: "crooked nose", "tip asymmetry", "wide nostrils", "dorsal sloop", "columellar show".
- Revision patients also reported "alar retraction", "pointy tip", and "nasal scarring" more frequently.
Conclusions:
- Primary rhinoplasty aims for a smaller, refined nose.
- Revision rhinoplasty addresses complex issues like asymmetry and crookedness.
- Understanding patient concerns aids surgeons in reducing revision rates and tailoring consultations.
