Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum

H Akiyama1, K Yamamoto, M Tsukanaka

  • 1Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, 4-6, Minatojimanakamachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe-City, Hyogo 650-0046, Japan. hakiyama@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Insights

Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts shows satisfactory mid-term outcomes. This study highlights the importance of structurally sound allografts for successful acetabular reconstruction.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Acetabular defects in revision total hip replacement pose significant challenges.
  • The Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts is a surgical option for complex acetabular reconstruction.
  • Management strategies vary based on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) defect classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular reconstruction using the Kerboull device with bone allografts.
  • To assess the impact of allograft type and defect classification on surgical success.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for allograft selection and preparation.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 40 hips in 36 patients undergoing acetabular reconstruction with a Kerboull device and bone allografts.
  • Classification of defects according to AAOS Type II and Type III.
  • Analysis of radiological failure, Merle d'Aubigné scores, and Kaplan-Meier survival rates.
  • Experimental analysis of mechanical properties of the device and bone grafts.

Main Results:

  • Five hips (12.5%) experienced radiological failure at a mean follow-up of 6.7 years; two of these were infected.
  • The mean Merle d'Aubigné score improved from 10 pre-operatively to 13.6 post-operatively.
  • The 10-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 87%, with radiological failure or revision as endpoints.
  • Structurally hard allografts from osteoarthritic femoral heads are recommended; bone graft thickness < 25 mm is acceptable for Type II defects with impacted grafts.

Conclusions:

  • Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts demonstrates satisfactory mid-term results.
  • The choice of structurally robust allografts is crucial for successful acetabular reconstruction.
  • This technique offers a viable solution for managing significant acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Related Concept Videos