Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026
Photoelectron Imaging of Anions Illustrated by 310 Nm Detachment of F−
Published on: July 27, 2018
Description of the geometric and electronic structures responsible for the photoelectron spectrum of FeO4(-)
Van Tan Tran1, Marc F A Hendrickx
1Afdeling Kwantumchemie en Fysicochemie, Departement Chemie, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Heverlee-Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract:
The relative stabilities of all low-lying conformations of FeO(4)(0/-) stoichiometry were investigated at the quantum mechanical BPW91, CASPT2, and RCCSD(T) levels of theory. For both the anionic and neutral clusters, the determination of the most stable structure appears to be a demanding task. The density functional theory and wave function second-order perturbation theory computational techniques place the doublet state of the tetrahedron-like O(4)Fe(-) conformation substantially lower, up to 0.81 eV, than the doublet state of η(2)-(O(2))FeO(2)(-). The coupled-cluster method reduces the energy difference to less than 0.01 eV. This equal stability of the ground states of O(4)Fe(-) and η(2)-(O(2))FeO(2)(-) leads to the assignment of the experimental photoelectron spectrum of FeO(4)(-). The lowest binding energy band (X band) is ascribed to the (2)A(1) → (1)A(1) ionization of η(2)-(O(2))FeO(2)(-), while the higher energy band (A band) mainly corresponds to the (2)E → (1)A(1) transition between the O(4)Fe(0/-) conformations. For a specific conformation, CASPT2 calculates the best electron detachment energies. The highest energy peak in this band with the weakest intensity could be ascribed to the (2)A(2) → (3)A(2) transition between the η(2)-(O(2))FeO(2) conformations. The two progressions are the result of ionizations from the anti-bonding orbitals of predominant iron 3d. For a specific conformation, CASPT2 calculates the best electron detachment energies. A BPW91 Franck-Condon simulation of the observed vibrational progressions further confirms the proposed assignments.
Related Concept Videos
02:58Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
02:46Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
02:46Electron Configurations
The relative energies of the subshells determine the order in which atomic orbitals are filled (1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s,...
01:16UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Molecular Electronic Transitions
03:02Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
01:23Atomic Spectroscopy: Absorption, Emission, and Fluorescence