Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

07:34
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Published on: August 22, 2018
Corvids can decide if a future exchange is worth waiting for
Valerie Dufour1, Claudia A F Wascher, Anna Braun
1Université de Strasbourg, IPHC, Strasbourg, France. valerie.dufour@iphc.cnrs.fr
Biology Letters
|September 17, 2011
Summary
Corvids, like carrion crows and common ravens, can delay gratification for better rewards. Their success in waiting depends on reward quality and time, with some using tactics to manage the delay.
Area of Science:
- Comparative psychology
- Animal behavior
- Cognitive evolution
Background:
- Evidence for time-dependent decision-making regarding future rewards is limited in non-human animals.
- Great apes show some capacity for delaying gratification in exchange tasks, comparable to humans.
- Corvids have demonstrated abilities in time-related tasks, suggesting potential for complex cognitive functions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate delay of gratification in two corvid species: the carrion crow (Corvus corone) and the common raven (Corvus corax).
- To assess how reward quality and delay duration influence corvid decisions in an exchange task.
- To compare corvid performance in delay of gratification tasks with non-human primates.
Main Methods:
- An exchange task was designed to test delay of gratification in carrion crows and common ravens.
- Varying delays (up to 320 seconds) were introduced between the choice and the reward.
- Reward quality and waiting time were manipulated to observe their effect on corvid decisions.
Main Results:
- Corvid success in delaying gratification decreased significantly as the delay duration increased.
- The decision to wait was influenced by both the quality of the future reward and the required waiting time.
- Corvids employed strategies such as placing rewards on the ground or caching them to mitigate waiting costs and distractions.
Conclusions:
- Corvids exhibit a capacity for delay of gratification, performing comparably to primates in certain contexts.
- The findings challenge previous assumptions about delayed gratification in birds, highlighting species-specific cognitive abilities.
- Corvid strategies for managing waiting periods suggest sophisticated temporal decision-making processes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Social Exchange Theory
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Exchange Theory
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
Mate Choice
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
The Availability Heuristic
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

